.

.
Formally Bug Drivel; now Freedom Lover USA ~ 2003 - 2016 : All Rights Reserved ~

Friday, October 31, 2008

Gun Sales Up - Socialism Right Around the Corner

Economy, Presidential Election Driving Up Gun Sales


FLORENCE, KY (FOX19) - Deepening fears of recession, and what the presidential election could bring in terms of regulation, are driving up sales of guns.

[...]

"When times are good, people buy new guns, and spend their money on guns, but when times are bad, they'll fix up a gun or sell a gun and someone else can buy it," said Garrett.

[...]

Some stores say they've seen a 25 percent increase in the sale of guns in the last three weeks, and not just because of hunting season."It took me buy surprise. We've been bombarded with customers," said Bryan Wiggins with Quick Cash Pawn.

This doesn't surprise me at all because the more and more I hear about Obama and his policies and the closer and closer we get to the election, the more scared I get about my freedoms being stolen away from me.

Stolen... away... from... me!! Not given freely by me... stolen away from me!

If a government threatens to take away a citizens right to protect himself, that is cause for panic... that is cause for paranoia.

But is it truly paranoia? We are closer now than we have ever been before to our country being turned into a socialistic heap of slavery.

Slavery!

Unless a person is a complete wacko, no one wants to be a slave... no one wants to be restricted from freedoms this country was founded on. Anyone who is afraid of slavery or hates slavery or despises slavery should not vote for Obama.

Ever hear of Jim Jones? Ya... he was revered as a great man... a visionary... but alas he was just a self absorbed nutcase who killed over 900 people just to keep them with him. Jim's idol was Mao Zedong and Jim was also a Marxist... and he had "questionable" friends. Sound familiar?

Want to live in shackles, want to have nothing other than what The One says you can have, want to die?

Drink more cool-aid.

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Obama's Love for Hilary (and ALL Americans)



After posting the pictures yesterday, I spent a little while looking through my files and found this one that I apparently forgot about... giggle... Barack just loves ALL Americans no matter what!!

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Baby Biden and the Oppressive Obama

Look... I'm an artist!! What's that? You mean it isn't art if it doesn't further the Liberal Agenda?



~ Big Baby Biden ~



How long before every reporter is given a pre-written script
by the left wing liberals who don't want their cereal split?




We should all fear for our own personal freedoms... all of us.





Ah... my personal favorite; you have to know this was a discussion at some point!!

Monday, October 27, 2008

Halloween Diplay Direct Threat to Sarah Palin

I found this info on Wake Up America and thought I would use it as a foundation for my own thoughts on this obvious hypocrisy.
One Hanging Display is 'Spirit of Halloween' and Another Is Racist?




In Greenfield Wisconsin a black mannequin was displayed, hanging, over a graveyard scene:

A dark mannequin figure was hanging from a tree in front of a Greenfield home. Some members of the African-American community complained it was insensitive and had racial overtones.

The homeowner has taken that figure down, but neighbors didn’t see this as a racial issue.

“It didn’t really strike me as anything unusual. It just looked like part of the graveyard scene,” neighbor Julie Salmeron said.

The owner says she never intended to offend anyone. The homeowner said the family hung the same mannequin last year for about six weeks without a single complaint and she was surprised by the negative attention it received this year.






And in West Hollywood, California a Hanging Sarah is still on display:

A Halloween decoration showing a mannequin dressed as vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin hanging by a noose from the roof of a West Hollywood home is drawing giggles from some passers-by and gasps of outrage from others.

The mannequin is dressed in brunet wig, glasses and a red business suit. Another mannequin dressed as John McCain emerges from a flaming chimney.

Chad Michael Morisette, who lives in the house, told CBS 2 News that drivers and bus passengers have been stopping to snap pictures of the macabre scene.

Morisette says the effigy would be out of bounds at any other time of year, but it's within the spirit of Halloween.


{Yoga moment... breathe in... breath out... no need to flip out}

What's good for the goose is good for the gander?

Racism is racism is racism. Either these two displays are or they are not a voice of racism. They are both Halloween decorations and they both depict individuals in a moment of DEATH; hanging from a noose. So... either it is allowed or it not allowed. It should not matter if the mannequin is black, white, yellow, red or purple with green polka dots. It's either okay or not okay.

So which is it?

...

I just showed these two pictures to my 17 year old son. He made a good point... the display of Palin hanging is an implied threat to her life. The previous display may be disturbing but it is not directed towards one particular person.

It isn't funny when anyone is hung from a noose but perhaps the authorities should keep an eye on this guy just in case his new found comedy act turns out to be a foretelling of future events.

So with my son's wisdom to follow... I would have to say that the display of Palin is worse then the other display as it is a direct threat to a particular person. Just like when Sandra went crazy on stage and said Palin would be gang raped if she dared to go into the wrong neighborhood. A threat is a threat!

But did you see that... did you see how I was distracted by the subject of "is this racist" or "is that racist"? Notice that?

This isn't really about racism... it's about people who want to hurt Palin.

...

I went over to visit David's site and noticed the same thought there... David Drake: Palin Effigy Hangs From Noose.

I wonder if Chad has been visited yet by the Secret Service? Maybe they can rendition him to a nice rat-infested prison cell located somewhere in Eastern Europe.
It's a threat to another human being who JUST SO HAPPENS to be running for Vice President of the United States of America.

Sunday, October 26, 2008

Obama and His Socialistic View Point VS Joe the Plumber - Just Another Whitey

Have you ever noticed how Obama tends to talk down to people and then how surprised he gets when he finds out that not everyone is accepting the brainwashing voodoo he's bouncing around the media?


{Obama's racist, elitist thoughts} Oh hey... there's some stupid looking white dude who does menial labor scooping out crap from toilets. Certainly he'll be glad to hear I want to spread the wealth around cause there's no way in hell this idiot could ever make $250,000... I mean (chuckle) who ever heard of anyone making that kind of cash by cleaning out pipes. I'll just tell him how happy he should be getting a bigger piece of the pie when I take from the rich and give to him and his other loser whiteys. Oh ya... he's gonna love me and if the "spreadin the wealth around" lie doesn't work then I'll make him feel guilty that he's white.


I'm going to apologize for this in advance but not for the reasons some may think. No... I'm going to apologize to Joe and all of the other regular tax paying, hard working men and women of every color and every religion and every other background you can think of who happen to live in this country.

It's a sad day when anyone pretends to understand your life and then has the audacity to try to fix it. These "fixes" that Obama offers up will not eliminate the rich in this country... it will expand the middle class by raising those who sit on their couches to an income just tasty enough to cause them to chant Obama's name. It will make those who have worked hard all their life to have the income to do what they want and help others wonder why they should even bother being TOO successful because those who already have permanent butt prints on their couches are going to take it away.

So that DOES sound like he WILL eliminate the rich, doesn't it? Sorry... he won't. Obama will make certain that the most liberal elite are very well off (proof is already out there) and will be able to keep the highest percentage of their money (until he's really called on it; then he'll lose followers when they whine about paying taxes just like "everyone else"). Screw the little guys... screw those who don't bow the lowest, screw those who DARE to stand up and say he's wrong, screw anyone who thinks blacks in this country don't have it BAD even though everyone has the same rights, screw you and you and you... oh... but not YOU, Mr. Liberal Lover; you're beautiful.

It's gone beyond disgusting... it's gone beyond revolting... and it's gone beyond what we ever thought would truly happen. Oh, people may have guessed there's a group out there that wants to take over and create their own perfect utopia-socialistic society. But not here, right? Not here in America where we're taught in school how bad communism and socialism is... not here where we're taught in school how evil Hitler was and what North Korea is REALLY all about.

What?!?! You mean they've down played all that and more? Now lets think... why on Earth would anyone want to down play events in world history that were evil and murderous and controlling? Why do that?

Because they want to be able to make us forget what happened in order to gain control of the masses and treat them like cattle going to the slaughter!!

Already so much of our history is far enough back, that there aren't many people who truly REMEMBER what happened. We are victims to the press and to the teachers who select the books that make it seem that the viciousness of Earth's history was like a week-long safari rather than years and years of horrendous dictatorships and terrorism.

I am embarrassed today to say I ever took that Journalism class in High School... and all those hours of playing on the floor of my grandmother's den while she listened to the news seems so far away now. The voices that soothed even when giving facts that weren't pleasant. Now they don't sooth me even when they make crap seem like roses. I want to know the truth. History isn't truth any more... history is whatever the elite liberals want it to be and that kind of control is unacceptable, unreliable and not worth the air they're breathing.




Wednesday, October 22, 2008

The Obama Presidency in Eight Minutes

A must see video... The Obama Presidency in Eight Minutes



This is a look into a future newscast under the "What if Obama wins" assumption.

Zo - Voting for McCain/Palin... and here's why!

Video: BTW I'm Voting For Mccain / Palin



A very good use of 10 minutes... Zo makes some great points and I think he can spread a message that so many others can not just because of differences we, as human beings, have created. I even book marked his My Space.


~~~

Video: THE VOTE REAPER



Video Description: A fight breaks out between Darth Barack and one of the common folk, when Obama demands his vote, and is told no! political satirical kung fu light saber fun!

And this one... another 10 minutes of great fun and a very good message. Take a look!

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Barney Frank wants an immediate increase in spending (that the rich can pay for later)





Wow... now here's a man with a pair.

Barney Frank says we need an "IMMEDIATE INCREASE IN SPENDING and I think this is a time when deficit fear has to take a second seat. I do think this is a time for a very important kind of dose of changenism. I believe later on there should be tax increases... speaking personally, I think there are a lot of very rich people out there whom we can tax at a point down the road and recover some of this money."

Okay... okay... he didn't really say "changenism"... he said Keynesianism. But come on... how can you tell?

I just love comments on YouTube or under articles. Now admitedly, I am ignorant when it comes to tax laws and exactly how taxes work for those making tons more money than me. Most of my comments are based on simple math.

I obviously don't know what I'm talking about in regards to exactly how much a person is taxed at certain points but I do know this... there are small businesses that already have plans in place for laying people off if Obama becomes president because they won't be able to afford to keep them. That is a huge statement.

There were more comments but I just pulled out what I thought may be found interesting.

~~~

ME
If I earn $20,000 and pay 15% but someone earning $300,000 pays 35%... they are paying a larger percentage of their income than I am.

Commenter "A"
you don't even pay that 15%

Commenter "B"
You just described the progressive tax system that has existed in America for over 100 years. You earn more you pay more in taxes. Period
.

ME
When someone says the rich aren't paying enough taxes, my first question is "how much do you want them to pay"? Let's pretend I earn $250,001 a year and I find out I'm going to be taxed more at that income. The easiest way to avoid it is to earn less. So I might as well just keep my income at $240k and stay right there. All it does is encourage me to succeed to a certain point and stop. It's a way to get people to remain at a level where they can be controlled.

Commenter "V"
your misunderstanking of tax brackets is not uncommon. The more you earn, the more you'll have in your pockets after being taxed. Therefore it is always rewarding to succeed and make more money.

Commenter "Z"
Point well taken, but this won't be the case necessarily. Suppose you did make $250,000 a year and is taxed more than the average person. Obama's plan would not still hurt the rich, because why???

lol... THEY ARE RICH!

Come on... do you seriously think BILL GATES will suffer under Obama's plan??? The Rich has NO FINANCIAL PROBLEMS with paying tax! But they do have serious problems when low class people, not being able to afford their next meal, steals from them.

ME
I think that's more a matter of being good to your fellow man. Honestly, I would rather be taxed less so I can give more away. I am not in control of how much Bill Gates gives to charities... but if someone who is very rich doesn't want to give away his or her money, should we then tax them for being greedy? That's one of those lines that is hard to find because "greed" can take on several definitions.

Commenter "J"
Should we tax them for being greedy? Absolutely; that's their punishment. Greed is a despicable human quality
.

~~~

And it's this last commenter that brings it all out into the clearning. Liberals want to tax the hell out of those THEY feel are greedy or not giving enough to their fellow man. There is no way to determine what is "too greedy" but somehow they have managed to figure out a way.

Anyone making over $250,000 is too greedy and must pay a greed tax.

Gosh... I certainly don't want to pay a greed tax... guess I'll just stay at the bottom of the food chain.

THAT IS WHAT THEY WANT... LOWLY PEASANTS TO DO THEIR BIDDING BECAUSE WE OWE THEM SOMETHING.

Monday, October 20, 2008

Senator Biden Wants McCain to Win UPDATE: Palin's Response

{Palin's response at botom}
What's up with Biden? It's pretty clear why the press avoids him like the plague and the only way he can get attention is to just start speaking in tongues.

The following article is found on ABC News Blogs... and people are quite dismayed by Biden's comments. Hell... towards the end of the 15+ minutes he was speaking he finally noticed the media was in the room. Finally noticed? I doubt it... I think he knew they were there and by playing dumb, he can later say to Barack "sorry dude, I didn't mean to dis you like that". Yet another "throwing in" of the towel by Barack's running mate.

Biden to Supporters: "Gird Your Loins", For the Next President "It's Like Cleaning Augean Stables"
October 20, 2008 7:35 AM

ABC News' Matthew Jaffe Reports: Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., on Sunday guaranteed that if elected, Sen. Barack Obama., D-Ill., will be tested by an international crisis within his first six months in power and he will need supporters to stand by him as he makes tough, and possibly unpopular, decisions.

"Mark my words," the Democratic vice presidential nominee warned at the second of his two Seattle fundraisers Sunday. "It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy. The world is looking. We're about to elect a brilliant 47-year-old senator president of the United States of America. Remember I said it standing here if you don't remember anything else I said. Watch, we're gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy."

"I can give you at least four or five scenarios from where it might originate," Biden said to Emerald City supporters, mentioning the Middle East and Russia as possibilities. "And he's gonna need help. And the kind of help he's gonna need is, he's gonna need you - not financially to help him - we're gonna need you to use your influence, your influence within the community, to stand with him. Because it's not gonna be apparent initially, it's not gonna be apparent that we're right."

Not only will the next administration have to deal with foreign affairs issues, Biden warned, but also with the current economic crisis.

"Gird your loins," Biden told the crowd. "We're gonna win with your help, God willing, we're gonna win, but this is not gonna be an easy ride. This president, the next president, is gonna be left with the most significant task. It's like cleaning the Augean stables, man. This is more than just, this is more than – think about it, literally, think about it – this is more than just a capital crisis, this is more than just markets. This is a systemic problem we have with this economy."

The Delaware lawmaker managed to rake in an estimated $1 million total from his two money hauls at the downtown Sheraton, the same hotel where four years ago Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., clinched the Democratic nomination. Despite warning about the difficulties the next administration will face, Biden said the Democratic ticket is equipped to meet the challenges head on.

"I've forgotten more about foreign policy than most of my colleagues know, so I'm not being falsely humble with you. I think I can be value added, but this guy has it," the Senate Foreign Relations chairman said of Obama. "This guy has it. But he's gonna need your help. Because I promise you, you all are gonna be sitting here a year from now going, 'Oh my God, why are they there in the polls? Why is the polling so down? Why is this thing so tough?' We're gonna have to make some incredibly tough decisions in the first two years. So I'm asking you now, I'm asking you now, be prepared to stick with us. Remember the faith you had at this point because you're going to have to reinforce us."

"There are gonna be a lot of you who want to go, 'Whoa, wait a minute, yo, whoa, whoa, I don't know about that decision'," Biden continued. "Because if you think the decision is sound when they're made, which I believe you will when they're made, they're not likely to be as popular as they are sound. Because if they're popular, they're probably not sound."

Biden emphasized that the mountainous Afghanistan-Pakistan border is of particular concern, with Osama bin Laden "alive and well" and Pakistan "bristling with nuclear weapons."

"You literally can see what these kids are up against, our kids in that region," Biden said in recalling when his helicopter was forced down due to a snowstorm there. "The place is crawling with al Qaeda. And it's real."

"We do not have the military capacity, nor have we ever, quite frankly, in the last 20 years, to dictate outcomes," he cautioned. "It's so much more important than that. It's so much more complicated than that. And Barack gets it."

After speaking for just over a quarter of an hour, Biden noticed the media presence in the back of the small ballroom.

"I probably shouldn't have said all this because it dawned on me that the press is here," he joked.

"All kidding aside, these guys have left us in a God-awful place," he then said of the Bush regime, promptly wrapping up his remarks. "We have the ability to straighten it out. It's gonna take a little bit of time, so I ask you to stay with us. Stay with us."

Image found here.

At the time I posted this, there were 1161 comments under this article above and here is a couple:

Posted by: Scott Oct 20, 2008 3:15:25 PM
Biden says the world will test Obama within six months and Obama may have to make unpopular decisions but all of us should prepare to stick with him. Just like it happened to Kennedy. Hmmmm. Let's review. Bay of Pigs and Cuban Missle Crisis, I'd say he pretty much failed but we stuck with him. Bush administration, actual massive attack on America, Bush had to make unpopular decisions, did Biden stick with him? Did Barack? Did the media?
Biden wants you to prepare for the impending disaster that is Barack Obama and as the going gets worse and worse, well, you just remember what Big Joe predicted and stick with them. Joe Biden - the gift that just keeps giving. Stand up for Joe and give him a hand, everyone!



Posted by: Steve Oct 20, 2008 3:15:48 PM
~snicker~
"Gird your loins" ??!???!??
What is
this? Some kind of Monty Python skit?
and...
"We're gonna win with your
help, God willing, we're gonna win,..."
Is Biden channeling Osama now,
too?

I like what Scott is saying above... Biden is preparing the masses for a disaster while Barack is the president so he can later say "I told you he would need your help and that you need to stick with him". You can't request that we "stick with Barack" if you're unwilling to stick with the current president, George Bush.

Hypocrites the lot of them.

And if Obama is loved by everyone, why does anyone have to ask the American public to stick with him? Perhaps it's because they’re using him as a catalyst to propel the Left into power that will lead into socialism. If this county is socialistic… other countries will have more opportunities to become stronger and eventually overthrow the United States and cause us to be considered our own little Third World country.

Conspiracy theory? I wonder

~

I do so love the analysis from David: Biden Says Electing Obama Brings Crisis

I thought Obama was beloved by "the whole world," that "the world is waiting for a leader like Obama." I thought Obama was "going to bring appeasement and pacifism peace and unity to the entire planet"? This is what his Cultists say about him. Why would anyone "test Obama?"

This comes down to a simple issue of trust and experience. Who do you trust to deal with terrorists and terrorism, John McCain or Barack Hussein Obama, Junior.

Biden is saying we're safer under McCain and that our Allies can depend on us with McCain. Can't say the same for Obama.

An Obama presidency will bring "an international crisis." Fantastic, Joe, great job. I wonder how much the Clintons are paying him to make statements like this?


Exactly... how much is Biden getting paid to throw this election? If Obama loses it won't be because he's black (as the Liberals and the Left are claiming)... it will be because Biden isn't really on Obama's side and he's giving a lot of us a very good reason not to vote for The One.

~


Remember this?
Is Senator Biden trying to throw this election?

Here is the whole post as originally posted at the link above:

~

In his own words he would have been honored to run WITH or AGAINST John McCain (see video below). So... since he couldn't run with him did he take on running against him just to be honored in so doing it? He states he thinks the country would be better off... better off in what way? More than likely he was stating the country would be better off with a man like McCain leading it.

So why did Joe Biden accept being Obama's VP running mate? Doesn't it seem odd that he would take the seat below a man he feels is not experienced enough to lead the country (see the two videos below).

And just today he claims Hilary would have made a better choice than him for Vice President. If that's true, then why did he except the position? Why didn't he tell Obama to choose Hilary? Or maybe he did but he was told "no" so he decided to do the next best thing.

It just seems a little fishy! Perhaps Joe Biden took this on because he feels he can help in sabotaging Obama's campaign. News for you JoeBama... he doesn't need your help in losing this election; all Barack has to do is speak in front of a camera and he adds yet another reason NOT to vote for him.

But seriously... why would he agree to running next to a man he doesn't believe in? I submit that Senator Biden is either trying to help Obama lose (again, he doesn't need help) or he's just so desperate to get his tush in some sort of presidential seat that he will run with Obama even though he's the wrong man for the job. Either way... he's a conniving politician who gives other politicians wet dreams.

After viewing the wonderful video files below, here are some more Biden facts: David Drake and his latest post about poor old pal of Biden: David Drake: Biden Asks Wheel Chair Bound Man To Stand Up


Video Files of Biden's Election-Throwing Techniques

Today, 9/10/08, Senator Biden claims that Hilary would make a better pick
for VP than him. Sounds like he's saying that Barack Obama made a mistake...
and if his campaign continues like this, that will definitely be true.






And definitely(?) an innocent mistake... but still another one of those goofs... ooops!
I'm wondering... if Senator Chuck Graham is Joe's "old pal", then how is it he
"forgot" that his "old pal" was in a wheelchair and COULDN'T stand up. Nice.






And here we have Joe Biden's own words about Barack Obama's readiness
for the presidency in August of 2007... has Obama gained enough experience
and knowledge in just one year to change Joe's mind?






So... I suppose SOME would say this is funny but how funny is it when you hear
a politician say one of those "old jokes everyone says"? Is it cute or innocent... or
just stupid to make stereo-typical jokes when there's A CAMERA RUNNING?
Video took place in June 2006. Clearly Joe's intent was to compliment... did he?






In 1988, Senator Biden felt that the white house wasn't the place to learn-as-you-go...
the candidate needs to know the territory in order to be a great president. He said
it again in August of 2007 but apparently, he has changed his mind.




A few links:

Wake up America: Joe Biden Admits Hillary Clinton Might Have Been A Better Pick As Veep - Wow... there's some real self confidence!

Gateway Pundit: LIPSTICK LIBERALS... Obama Camp Gangs Up On Alaska Mom - Looks like Obama really doesn't need your help Joe.

David Drake: Biden: "Hillary a better VP choice than me." - Doesn't it make you confident in Obama and Biden?



Additions from today's post:

You Must Trust Dear Leader During Coming National Crisis

If Obama Is Elected There Will Be A International Crisis

UPDATE: Palin's Response


Sunday, October 19, 2008

Obama and Ayers - K.I.S.S.I.N.G.

Obama and Ayers siting in an office
K.I.S.S.I.N.G
First came sick admiration,
then came a sicker suck-up,
then came Marxism in the form of a presidential candidate

I know... it doesn't sound all that great when you sing it... but why would you even want to try?

~

Bill Ayers, as found on Wikipedia:


In an interview published in 1995, Ayers characterized his political beliefs at that time and in the 1960s and 1970s:

"I am a radical, Leftist, small 'c' communist ... [Laughs] Maybe I'm the last communist who is willing to admit it. [Laughs] We have always been small 'c' communists in the sense that we were never in the Communist party and never Stalinists. The ethics of Communism still appeal to me. I don't like Lenin as much as the early Marx. I also like Henry David Thoreau, Mother Jones and Jane Addams...

Source: Chepesiuk, Ron, "Sixties Radicals, Then and Now: Candid Conversations With Those Who Shaped the Era", McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers: Jefferson, North Carolina, 1995, "Chapter 5: Bill Ayers: Radical Educator", p. 102


Do you think Obama was just fascinated with Bill's radical views and was simply "analyzing" him. I mean... analyzing someone else's views can be extremely fascinating... especially if they are radical and "above the norm". Often people dive into a subject or another part of society they didn't necessarily approve of... such as those researching the darkest parts of religion.

If you are a Christian and believe wholeheartedly in God and all the goodness of his word, then why on Earth would you want to study Satanism? The excuse is, of course, to understand one's own enemy... to be able to fight against it. This can and does happen in many aspects of life.

There are those working for our country who study the "religion" of Islam... why... well, to better understand what they believe and to be able to fight against it.

There are those who study criminology... why... to better understand how to combat against those who break the most heinous laws.

In all of that, there are those who fall into the well of whatever subject they are studying. If one studies satanism, they can fall into it's well and either find depression that overwhelms them or they find that somehow this "once thought to be horrible religion" is now where they want to be.

There would therefore be those as listed above who would fall into Islam or perhaps find that being a criminal is somehow romantic.

Studying a subject is fine... diving into its well is dangerous and shows a sign of a weak mind.

So which is it?

  • Did Obama agree with Bill's "religion" of terrorism and anti-Americanism and that's why he spent so much time with him?

  • Did Obama just find Bill Ayers fascinating and want to study him in order to combat against his beliefs at a future date?

  • Did Obama study Bill and then find his own mind to be weak and fell into Ayer's well where he was recruited for a later date when he would seek out the presidency. Is Bill Ayers giving Obama little bits of advice to take into the presidency and destroy this country?

~

David Drake: Bachmann Hits Nerve On Obama Anti-Americanism: "Don't forget, Obama did fundraising for a terrorist group Hamas. Hamas' top, high ranking leader Ahmed Yousuf has officially endorsed Obama as the candidate he and Hamas would like to see win the election!

Is Obama surrounded by people who represent the best interests of America or not? This is not a difficult question unless you are part of the Kool-Aid Drinking Obama Cult.

As if anyone needs further proof of Obama's anti-Americanism, what are the first things canceled at an Obama rally to make time for a speaker? Why, the singing of the National Anthem and the recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance. The Union Leader:


[Zach] Bencal, who sings the [National] anthem for a number of school events and is actively involved in local community theatre, had been contacted by the Obama campaign to sing the anthem. He agreed to do so, then was told later in the evening the anthem had been scratched from the program. Bencal said he was told by the campaign the decision was a simple programming change to make room for another speaker.

'I guess it just wasn't meant to be,' Bencal said.

Sandra Abrevaya, communications director for the Obama campaign's Manchester office, confirmed the choice had simply been a last-minute scratch from the rally's program, which included the Pledge of Allegiance."

Obama's priorities sound so "for the people", don't they? What is so tremendously ironic in this election is that it proves beyond a doubt that people have the ultimate blinders on just so they can get WHAT THEY WANT and not WHAT WE NEED.

Even Howard Sterns Obama Experiment shows how people wear blinders and don't have a clue what Obama stands for, who he's running with (let alone against) and they don't even know what they believe in themselves.

It's sickening how much people resemble cattle.

~

Gateway Pundit: Obama & Ayers Shared Chicago Office For Years On the Same Floor... And Maoist Hardliner Mike Klonsky Worked There Too:

"Barack Obama told Stephanopoulos:

'George this is of what I'm talking about. This is a guy who lives in my neighborhood who's a professor of English in Chicago who I know and who I have not received some official endorsement from... The notion that somehow that by me knowing someone who engaged in detestable acts 40 years ago when I was 8 years old somehow reflects on my values doesn't make much sense George.'
Verum Serum discovered that not only were Barack Obama and Bill Ayers close associates but they shared the same office together.

[...]

Obama and Ayers were serving on the same board in 2002- less than six years ago.
And they shared an office - for 3 years on the same floor.
But Obama says he's just "a guy who lives in my neighborhood."
No Senator, he's not.

More... Joshua discovered who else was working in the office with Obama and unrepentant terrorist Bill Ayers... The radical 1960's Maoist Mike Klonsky.

How much research did Obama really need to make... he shared an office with a man who is a radical... a terrorist... and for what? Was it all for the sake of understanding of what Bill Ayers represents?

Or is Obama just weak minded? It seems the Liberals have some kind of sick fascination with those who break the law or want to destroy this country.

{Soap Box Moment}
If someone molests a small child, they get all mushy FOR THE CRIMINAL who committed the crime and have some sick desire to "get to the heart" of the pervert. "Oh... the poor man... he must have been abused as a child... we must forgive him and give him a second chance". To what? Find another child?

Oh don't get me wrong, they will help the child... how... well, by causing him or her to re-live the experience over and over by "talking" about it until they force the child to understand that they must live the rest of their miserable life remembering what happened and never "getting over it".
{End of "that" soap box}

And yet... they seem to think when someone breaks the law or wants to destroy our country, that is shows strength and individualism and a divine knowledge of something "way out there" that we can somehow touch if we just free our minds.

The only thing "way out there" is their WEAK MINDED MENTALITY. Get a grip on reality people.

Destroying something just for the sake of somehow getting in touch with your "inner terrorist" is beyond stupid. We have people claiming that they are actually... get this... using their freedom of speech rights by destroying pro-life displays (a new post on this subject coming soon). That's not using freedom of speech... that's destroying someone else's property because you can't deal with your own inner anger issues or face up to them.

If you're Pro-Choice or Pro-Life, more than likely you have a logical reason for feeling the way you do. But there are those out there who pick a topic and then stand behind it WITHOUT a reason. They chose a side that all their cool friends have chosen and they have no other reason, so their only response it to destroy things that don't agree with their "made-up" and therefore indefensibly beliefs. How can you possibly defend something you don't understand?

You want to invoke your freedom of speech rights? MAKE YOUR OWN DAMN DISPLAY and display it next to it. DUH!!!

~

Barack Obama is in bed with terrorist and his "pretend" anger against those making these accusations is even more proof. Ever notice that the louder he does protest, the more proof that comes out against him?


A larger picture to show that this is a real photo and not doctored is found HERE.

Ayers mentions Obama in his book.

Michelle Obama worked with Ayers' wife in 1987 - supposedly where Barack met Michelle.

Where is the media... has anyone heard this on CBS or NBC or ABC? What about in the New York Times? Have they come out to question Barack on this sort of proof... or... will you just find editorials and blogs stating that it's irrelevant?

Friday, October 17, 2008

"Kill Him" Unfounded, Unproved & Still a Highlight of the Liberal Racial Smear Campaign

It doesn't matter that the Secret Service was in the audience and that NONE of them heard the supposed outburst from "someone" yelling "kill him".

Agent Bill Slavoski said he was in the audience, along with an undisclosed number of additional secret service agents and other law enforcement officers and not one heard the comment.
It doesn't matter that not only did this "outburst" apparently not reference Barack Obama but it actually never happened. It doesn't matter because what the Liberal Left says is ultimately written word-for-word into the history books while the truth is stomped into a garbage can and lit on fire.

David Drake: "Kill Him" Threat Found Baseless

Well, there it is. The Secret Service does not let their personal political bent interfere with their jobs. No one is able to substantiate the "kill him." This is because The Left and The Obama Cultists are desperate to win the election.

Obama must not be all that and more, if his Cultists are so desperate to steal the election. This was a fabricated scare tactic, a shameless play of The Race Card and The Hate Card. This is your standard operating procedure for The Liberals.

No 'Kill Him' Threats At Palin Rally

Thursday, October 16, 2008

John McCain's speech at Alfred E Smith Memorial Dinner

Oh, I can't "NOT" post this video... it's priceless. McCain's speech at Alfred E Smith Memorial Dinner was hysterical... and jabbing in a most amusing way. Even Barack Obama and Hilary Clinton were practically falling out of their seats...


Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Two Questions for Barack Obama

I have two questions to ask Senator Obama. I would truly like to hear his answers.

Part I
What advice would you give to white Americans who do not agree with your politics and have therefore decided not to vote for you but are faced with the finger pointing and the nastiness coming from the media and individuals who insist that not voting for you is a sign of being a racist, even if such an accusation is completely false?

Part II
What would you say to those in the media and to the finger-pointers who are calling McCain supporters racist and thereby attemption to manipulate and bully them which is causing people to be afraid to express their opinions?

Monday, October 13, 2008

The Obama Cabinet

The New Obama Cabinet - sometimes the "humor" in cartoons really shows the true reality of our situation.

Barack Obama's Partial-Birth Abortion Policies

The more I hear about what people want to do and what people actually do... the more disgusted I feel and the more empty I feel inside. How can any man or woman function after performing a partial birth abortion? How can you do this and then go home to your own children or, if you don't have any, how can you simply look yourself in the eyes while you're getting ready every morning in front of the mirror?



As seen HERE ... documentation from medical experts... detailed images of partial birth abortions. These are actually medical drawings and are not actual pictures of real people (thank goodness... I think that would just put me over the edge... although there may be some people who NEED to go over the edge). I do have my own opinions but the more I hear, the more I realize that just giving in a "little" to the Liberal Left leads to this type of murderous activity. Seems to me that every time they receive a little of what they want, all they do is ask for more!!

Howard Stern's Obama Experiment

This only proves that people will vote for Obama simply because he is "Obama". It really doesn't matter where the people are from who are asked these questions... it has to do with the fact that people have their blinders on and don't care WHAT the policies are... they just care about "WHO" is in power and the message behind that choice.

These are the questions asked... can you see a potential problem?

"Are you for Obama because he's more pro-life or because he wants to keep our troops in Iraq to finish this war."

"If he wins would you have any problem with Sarah Palin being Vice President?"

"How do you feel about Obama being "anti-stem" research?"

... And the answers are...

Madonna wants to kick Sarah Palin's ass

How wonderful... she's gone from being "like a virgin" to being like a "violence-pusher".

I'm not sure if I'm really surprised any more by the Desperate Entertainer's Guild.

Thursday, October 9, 2008

The Death of Journalism



In High School, teachers taught that being a journalist meant reporting facts about factual events. Looking back I realize this was just a cover story to the truth behind what our teachers were truly trying to get us, their students, to do.

If our stories were not colorful enough or didn't grab the attention of the readers within those first three sentences, we were chastised and given a low grade. We were encouraged to be flamboyant and, inevitably, to make up stories... all the while we were told... "report the facts" and "make it sound interesting and grab your readers".

Sorry Mrs. Hypocrite... I didn't make the grade. Why? Was it truly because I just wasn't good at writing interesting news articles or was it because I was confused as to what I was supposed to do in order to get a good grade in the class?

I walked away from that year confused and frustrated. I DID report the facts and I thought I made it interesting... but when I look back at those old High School newspapers, I realize that the students that "made the grade" were those that made a factual event into an exaggerated, fantastic experience that... in some cases... never happened. I was green, I realize that, but I thought I was a bad writer... that I sucked at being a journalist and reporting the news. The truth was that I DID report the news; the true news... and I was given a bad grade for doing it.

That being said, I was also shy and reclusive and interviewing people was very difficult for me... some might say that my lack of self esteem may be a cause for not writing a good article. For the sake of "playing fair", that may be partially true... but for the sake of "being honest", it's only partially true. Even if I had never interviewed a soul... if I had made my articles shine and jump off the page, it wouldn't have mattered if truth was involved.

How long have the educators of our children been expressing to them the morals of society with back-stage whispering that it's okay to break the rules so long as it is to the benefit of "those in charge"... wink, wink... nudge, nudge... say no more.

Lets just say it's been happening for at least the last 40 years... at least. And those who insist that journalist tell more and more white lies and more and more exaggerated stories are the true villains. Journalist MUST make their news sound like life and death... they MUST grab the reader's attention and reel them in. Reel them in to what? Not the truth... that's not what matters any more. They reel them in to lies and twisted realities to change the world we live in.

One day these educators and back-whispers just may get what they ultimately THOUGHT they wanted... a society of people who do what they are told because they want so desperately to fit in with the elitist. If that day arrives... they will be slapped in the face and stand there wondering what went wrong.

It's really not fun controlling people who need babysitters.

Friday, October 3, 2008

Palin's Wonderful Moments



Another thing that they're not talking about very much was Sarah Palin interestingly was the only person I've heard say anything about it. She said it last night. Is the responsibility or the irresponsibility of the American people... People need to learn to live within their means and not be signing up for loans that they can't afford. Everybody is not helpless. There's personal responsibility and they need to be talking directly to the American people and Sarah Palin is the only one who is doing that.


Sarah Palin Interview with Carl Cameron of FOX News - Part 1 - Barracuda Annoyed by Elf (Katie Couric)



Sarah Palin Interview with Carl Cameron of FOX News - Part 2 - Barracuda Wants to Keep Fighting in Michigan



Sarah Palin Interview with Carl Cameron of FOX News - Part 3 - Barracuda Slams Activist and Unconstitutional Supreme Court Decisions






Undecided voters? These people are fed up with the crap... aren't we all?

Biden's 10 Big Misstatements

Is Biden just an idiot or is he a liar? And which word makes us feel better?

Thursday, October 2, 2008

The Obama Family's Anger Problems

I guess I don't see Barack in the same light as others. In my research of him and his anger issues, it turns out several people want him to get angrier (1) instead of remaining so cool and collected.

I was surprised by this... although not entirely. I can see that he's pretty cool and under control most of the time so it's understandable that people think he's not angry.

The reason I began researching this was because I noticed some underlying anger when he was confronted in certain situations. I am not one of those people who thinks that Obama is NOT angry... I believe he is VERY angry and that if he is poked too hard, he may just explode and finally show us what he's really all about. Defending yourself is one thing... but there's proof out there in videos where he's getting angry at old ladies who dare to ask the hard questions or he gets angry because a group of people are at his rally displaying signs in protest (people who happen to be black... how dare they!!). You can see it in his face and you can hear it in his voice... this man is a well controlled missile of anger.

What will happen if he finally loses control of this anger missile as president? There have been plenty of presidents who got angry at different times, it's true... but how will Obama react when the pressure is REALLY on?

Quote: "The anger is real. It is powerful, and to simply wish it away, to condemn it without understanding its roots, only serves to widen the chasm of misunderstanding that exists between the races." - Barack Obama
Obama's Anger - The few paragraphs below from this article relate a story wherein Barack commented that black Americans think they are owed and that as long as they do, they will go nowhere. I think he's right... and if he could stick with that story, it would show how much he really cares.

He was interested in my story, and after about an hour getting to know each other I asked him point blank why these Vietnamese refugees, with no money, friends, or knowledge of the language could be, within a generation, so successful. I also asked him why it was so difficult to convince young black men to abandon the streets and take advantage of the same kinds of opportunities that the Vietnamese had recently embraced.

His answer, only a few words, not only floored me but became sort of a razor that has allowed me ever since to slice through all of the rhetoric regarding race relations that Democrats shovel our way during election season:

"We're owed and they aren't."

In short, he concluded, "they're hungry and we think we're owed. It's crushing us, and as long as we think we're owed we're going nowhere."
And yet... he has given speeches wherein he makes his skin color THE issue by telling us he's someone different than former candidates. Why do that if it doesn't matter to him? Because it does matter to him. He's too focused on being the first black president that he can't help but state it by "not" stating it (in other words, he spends too much time saying it doesn't matter that he's black... why even bring it up?).

Just like his fellow democrats and liberals who continue to say that IF their favorite candidate is somehow not elected, then it will be because he's black... why?... well because they totally and completely agree with his politics and therefore can't see any other reason why anyone would not vote for him. Oh... and they use it as an excuse and a way to make people feel guilty for not voting for a black man. They tell people that if they don't vote for Obama, then they are racist; I have read it in articles and in blogs. That's obsurd!! Skin is not the issue.

~

Obama's promotion of violence - I see this very subtle request for his supporters to get in the faces of those who oppose them as a request for violence. If someone were to get in my face and start arguing with me about what I beleive in... I would walk away and never speak with that person again. But there are those who would not take that and strike back... and be called a racist for doing it no matter what the differences were racially between the two individuals because the discussion would be about Obama. Fair? Doubtful.

Obama heckled... and his reaction - calm... cool... collected... and yet "let me finish what I have to say... alright..." they aren't harsh words at all and he's trying so hard to remain calm, I can see that. So a person can study videos all day long and always find some sort of something in a person's facial expressions or in their eyes. Is it really there? Well, I didn't study the video... it was something in those few seconds that radiated a hidden issue... I wonder how high his blood pressure rose.

Obama's "love" for white people - Quote by Barack "The point I was making was not that my grandmother harbors any racial animosity - she doesn't. But she is a typical white person who... if she sees somebody on the street that she doesn't know there's a reaction in her that's been bred into our experiences that don't go away, and that sometimes come out in the wrong way."

~

Obama's Anger - It isn't race, it's a mindset. I am putting most of this article here, but there is more if you follow the link.

A good test case for this theory is Katrina. Obama, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and assorted white apologists continue to express anger and outrage over the federal response to the Katrina disaster. But where were the Vietnamese "leaders" expressing their "anger?" The Vietnamese comprise a substantial part of the New Orleans population, and yet are absent was any report claiming that the Vietnamese were "owed" anything. This is not to say that the federal response was an adequate one, but we need to take this as a sign that maybe the problem has very little to do with racism and a lot to with a mindset.

The mindset that one is "owed" something in life has not only affected black mobility in business but black mobility in education as well. Remember Ward Churchill? About fifteen years ago he was my boss. After leaving the fishing boats, I attended graduate school at the University of Colorado at Boulder. I managed to get a job on campus teaching expository writing to minority students who had been accepted provisionally into the university on an affirmative action program. And although I never met him, Ward Churchill, in addition to teaching in the ethnic studies department, helped to develop and organize the minority writing program.

The job paid most of my bills, but what I witnessed there was absolutely horrifying. The students were encouraged to write essays attacking the white establishment from every conceivable angle and in addition to defend affirmative action and other government programs. Of the hundreds of papers that I read, there was not one original contribution to the problem of black mobility that strayed from the party line.

The irony of it all however is that the "white establishment" managed to get them into the college and pay their entire tuition. Instead of being encouraged to study international affairs, classical or modern languages, philosophy or art, most of these students became ethnic studies or sociology majors because it allowed them to remain in disciplines whose orientation justified their existence at the university. In short, it became a vicious cycle.

There was a student there I'll never forget. He was plucked out of the projects in Denver and given a free ride to the university. One day in my office he told me that his mother had said the following to him: "M.J., they owe you this. White people at that university owe you this." M.J.'s experience at the university was a glorious fulfillment of his mother's angst.

There were black student organizations and other clubs that "facilitated" the minority student's experience on the majority white and "racist" campus, in addition to a plethora of faculty members, both white and black, who encouraged the same animus toward the white establishment. While adding to their own bona fides as part of the trendy Left, these "facilitators" supplied M.J. with everything he needed to quench his and his mother's anger, but nothing in the way of advice about how to succeed in college. No one, in short, had told M.J. that he needed to study. But since he was "owed" everything, why put out any effort on his own?

In a fit of despair after failing most of his classes, M.J. wandered into my office one Friday afternoon in the middle of the semester and asked if I could help him out. I asked M.J. about his plans that evening, and he told me that he usually attended parties on Friday and Saturday nights. I told him that if he agreed to meet me in front of the university library at 6:00pm I would buy him dinner. At 6pm M.J. showed up, and for the next twenty minutes we wandered silently through the stacks, lounges, and study areas of the library. When we arrived back at the entrance I asked M.J. if he noticed anything interesting. As we headed up the hill to a popular burger joint, M.J. turned to me and said:

"They were all Asian. Everyone in there was Asian, and it was Friday night."

Nothing I could do, say, or show him, however, could match the fire power of his support system favoring anger. I was sad to hear of M.J. dropping out of school the following semester.

During my time teaching in the writing program, I watched Asians get transformed via leftist doublespeak from "minorities" to "model minorities" to "they're not minorities" in precise rhythm to their fortunes in business and education. Asians were "minorities" when they were struggling in this country, but they became "model minorities" when they achieved success. Keep in mind "model minority" did not mean what most of us think it means, i.e., something to emulate. "Model minority" meant that Asians had certain cultural advantages, such as a strong family tradition and a culture of scholarship that the black community lacked.

To suggest that intact families and a philosophy of self-reliance could be the ticket to success would have undermined the entire angst establishment. Because of this it was improper to use Asian success as a model. The contortions the left exercised in order to defend this ridiculous thesis helped to pave the way for the elimination of Asians altogether from the status of "minority."

This whole process took only a few years.

Eric Hoffer said:

"...you do not win the weak by sharing your wealth with them; it will but infect them with greed and resentment. You can win the weak only by sharing your pride, hope or hatred with them."

We now know that Barack Obama really has no interest in the "audacity of hope." With his race speech, Obama became a peddler of angst, resentment and despair. Too bad he doesn't direct that angst at the liberal establishment that has sold black people a bill of goods since the 1960s. What Obama seems angry about is America itself and what it stands for; the same America that has provided fabulous opportunities for what my black friend called "hungry" minorities. Strong families, self-reliance, and a spirit of entrepreneurship should be held up as ideals for all races to emulate.

In the end, we should be very suspicious about Obama's anger and the recent frothings of his close friend Reverend Wright. Says Eric Hoffer:

The fact seems to be that we are least open to precise knowledge concerning the things we are most vehement about. Vehemence is the expression of a blind effort to support and uphold something that can never stand on its own.


Michelle Obama - she has tried to control it but her anger seeps up to the surface until it itches it's way out and she just can't help but get into everyone's face to let them know exactly what she's all about. Do I want an angry first lady... especially one who obviously will be influencing Barack's political career? No... I don't. Michelle Obama has shown her quiet and controlled side just like her husband but the truth is in her eyes... she can't stand anyone who doesn't think the way she does and I don't want to be under her angry thumb. Seems to me, she wears the pants in the family (that should anger someone).







(1) want him to get angrier - by the way, there are a few videos in this link that I found interesting... one of Ronald Reagan getting angry when someone wanted to turn off his microphone and he said "I'm paying for this microphone!!" The other video is of Barack Obama in Elko Nevada during an interview (below)... the last minute of this interview actually showed him "connecting" and being honest about his chances about being elected and the fact he claims if he isn't elected he will NOT blame it on the fact he's black; too bad his politics aren't as smooth as his words.

May we each take the moment necessary out of this day and any day we feel the need to remember those who have gone before us in defense of our freedoms. Without them... we would not be "here"... we would be in chains. ~Bug~