Formally Bug Drivel; now Freedom Lover USA ~ 2003 - 2016 : All Rights Reserved ~

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

What Caused Our Economic Crisis?

This video is about 11 minutes long and takes a lot of reading and pausing if you want to check the sources of information... but quite interesting.

Original video with different music... apparently Warner Music Group tried to claim copyright because of the music being played in the background (although we can still watch it, so it must not have been an issue after all).

... although... they apparently contributed $338,527 to Barack Obama's campaign.

Saturday, September 27, 2008

Debate Analysis and 7 Major Flip-Flops

Want some great analysis of the 1st debate? Read David's post and get some great insight.

David Drake: Presidential Debate Number One Analysis

Here are just a few examples:

* Obama couldn't name one program or issue where he would implement budget cuts or reductions. Not one thing. Obama is the textbook definition of a Liberal Tax and Spender.

* Obama wants more troops in Afghanistan. Using Liberal Logic (not that there is such a thing), this means that Obama is a warmonger, that he loves bloodshed and destruction. Remember, it's the Liberals who say, "war is always wrong," yet his supporters will not hold him to the same standard that they do a Republican who would advocate more Troops being sent to Afghanistan. Never underestimate the ability of Liberals to remain in a deep state of denial.

* At one point, Obama referred to John McCain as, "Tom." Did Obama hit the crack pipe prior to the debate? Could be.

I wondered if I was the only one who noticed he called him Tom. Interesting... I'm quite sure
we could analyize this further if we really wanted to. What was Obama trying to say?


Gateway Pundit: NOT BAD... Obama Only Has 7 Major Flip Flops At First Debate

Obama's forceful objection to Russia going into Georgia.

Obama will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems... and yet he believes
we need missile defence because of Iran and North Korea (although he previously stated
that Iran is no great threat). Which is it???

Friday, September 26, 2008

What did Henry Kissinger really say?

News Sources (video further down the page):
Transcripts at CNN.com: What did Henry Kissinger really say?
Fact Check at ABCNEWS: Kissinger Defends McCain's Iran Stance
Fact checking the presidential debates

Now lets start with some quotes and some thoughts on those quotes.

Transcript of what Henry Kissinger really said?
KISSINGER: Well, I am in favor of negotiating with Iran. And one utility of negotiation is to put before Iran our vision of a Middle East, of a stable Middle East, and our notion on nuclear proliferation at a high enough level so that they have to study it. And, therefore, I actually have preferred doing it at the secretary of state level so that we -- we know we're dealing with authentic...

SESNO: Put at a very high level right out of the box?

KISSINGER: Initially, yes. And I always believed that the best way to begin a negotiation is to tell the other side exactly what you have in mind and what you are -- what the outcome is that you're trying to achieve so that they have something that they can react to.

Now, the permanent members of the Security Council, plus Japan and Germany, have all said nuclear weapons in Iran are unacceptable. They've never explained what they mean by this. So if we go into a negotiation, we ought to have a clear understanding of what is it we're trying to prevent. What is it going to do if we can't achieve what we're talking about?

But I do not believe that we can make conditions for the opening of negotiations. We ought, however, to be very clear about the content of negotiations and work it out with other countries and with our own government.
Oh, I can see how the Lovely Liberals are using this to say Kissinger is stating we should meet with Iran without preconditions... except if you read the whole statement, he's really saying that he prefers negotiating at the Secretary of State level... NOT the Presidential level; and that is what the argument is about.

It isn't about whether or not we would negotiate without preconditions... it's about whether or not the PRESIDENT should be the one to do it!!

Here is a little portion of the 1st Presidential Debate of 2008 and the argument regarding this very thing. Obama HAS stated he would meet with anyone without preconditions. He means that HE PERSONALLY will meet... not someone else... not the Secretary of State... HIM. McCain then states that Kissinger did NOT say that the President is the one to meet without preconditions. McCain might agree with meeting without preconditions... but not HIM PERSONALLY as that gives off a very bad sign to other countries.

McCain Stuns Obama-Catches Him Lying About Kissinger!


Fact Check: Kissinger Defends McCain's Iran Stance

ABC News' Kirit Radia Reports: Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger came to the defense of longtime friend Sen. John McCain following Friday's presidential debate saying he "would not recommend the next President of the United States engage in talks with Iran at the Presidential level."

"Senator McCain is right. I would not recommend the next President of the United States engage in talks with Iran at the Presidential level. My views on this issue are entirely compatible with the views of my friend Senator John McCain. We do not agree on everything, but we do agree that any negotiations with Iran must be geared to reality," Kissinger said in statement issued by the McCain campaign.

Fact checking the presidential debates

OBAMA: "Senator McCain mentioned Henry Kissinger, who is one of his advisers, who along with five recent secretaries of state just said we should meet with Iran — guess what? — without preconditions."

MCCAIN: "Dr. Kissinger did not say that he would approve face-to-face meetings between the president of the United States and (Iranian President Mahmoud) Ahmadinejad. He did not say that. He said there could be secretary-level and lower-level meetings. I've always encouraged that."

THE FACTS: Obama was right that Kissinger called for meetings without preconditions. McCain was right that Kissinger did not call for such meetings to be between the two presidents.

In a foreign policy forum Saturday, Kissinger said: "I am in favor of negotiating with Iran." He went on to say "I actually have preferred doing it at the secretary of state level" and the U.S. should go into the talks with "a clear understanding of what is it we're trying to prevent. What is it going to do if we can't achieve what we're talking about? But I do not believe that we can make conditions for the opening of negotiations. We ought, however, to be very clear about the content of negotiations and work it out with other countries and with our own government."
I'm sure there's more out there...

Wednesday, September 24, 2008

Rep. Alcee Hastings believes those who own guns and hunt are racist

Dem Leader on Palin: "Anybody toting guns and stripping moose don’t care too much about what they do with Jews and blacks"

CNN Article:

(CNN) – Rep. Alcee Hastings told an audience of Jewish Democrats Wednesday that they should be wary of Republican VP nominee Sarah Palin because “anybody toting guns and stripping moose don’t care too much about what they do with Jews and blacks.”

“If Sarah Palin isn’t enough of a reason for you to get over whatever your problem is with Barack Obama, then you damn well had better pay attention,” Rep. Alcee Hastings of Florida said at a panel about the shared agenda of Jewish and African-American Democrats Wednesday. Hastings, who is African-American, was explaining what he intended to tell his Jewish constituents about the presidential race. “Anybody toting guns and stripping moose don’t care too much about what they do with Jews and blacks. So, you just think this through,” Hastings added as the room erupted in laughter and applause.

I... uh... hmmm... well, now. I guess if I think REAL HARD and focus on the speck on the wall, I can begin to see why someone who owns a gun and hunts would not care about Jews and blacks. Ya... I can see it now.


To quote a well used phrase... WTF??

So does this mean there are NO Jews and NO blacks who own guns or hunt? Really? Interesting... and false.

This makes no sense what-so-ever but someone out there will say something stupid like "it's about time someone put those things together".

It's just one more way for the left to look at something and come up with an unreasonable connection to nothing.


So... someone from the US Department of Justice visted my site today using Google to search for "conservative actors". The visit was less than a minute and the pages visited were here and here ... how weird is that.

Nothing to worry about... I'm guessing someone was on lunch break, right? Errr... that's it, right?

Well... "conservative actors" is still the number one hit. Is it fans searching out whom to feel good about... or actors trying to see what list they are on... or maybe the government trying to determine which actors need bugs in their phones? :o)

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

O'Reilly Website Hacked - who did it?

O'Reilly Website Hacked... Leftists Post Info on Premium Members

Someone stated that it isn't known that those who broke into O'Reilly's website are actually leftists since wikileaks isn't a leftist sight. My respone is below.

Well you can bet that if these hackers were breaking into Obama's website the Left would come out and say it was a right wing conspiracy. It doesn't matter what their political position is... by breaking the law in this manner and striking out at one particular group, they are making a statement... even if it's not what they intended.

These people are insecure little twits who just want attention in the only way they know how to get it. I'm sure there are those who disagree but what would you call someone who sneaks in to another person's house and either takes things or moves things or leaves things that are unwanted? Oh ya... I would be calling that person a criminal and calling the police.

It doesn't matter their affiliation... they are breaking the law and at the moment they are striking out against republicans and conservative websites. They are making a political statement.

If all these hackers do is break into sights that are conservative and/or republican... guess what... they're making a political statement.

Sunday, September 21, 2008

Feminists against Palin - the hypocrisy of the left

My comments to the article shown below:

Bug9/21/2008 8:25:02 AM
Thank you for this article. The last few months has shown us exactly where people stand. I feel every woman has the same rights as men and should be given the same opportunities, etc. I'm confused by those who state the same thing but then slam someone down if they don't fall into the mold they wish her to fall into. It proves that it's not that "every" woman should have these rights and go forth and succeed... its that "every" woman should go forth and succeed the way liberals and feminists WANT them to; and only if they are on their side. It's unfortunate that they can't see that Sarah stood up for herself and did what they state every woman should do. If Sarah was running on the democratic ticket I have a strong sense that all of this would be different and she would be considered a hero.

Again... the hypocrisy of the liberal left (including most democrats apparently and definitely including the feminists) is sickening. They only want women to succeed in the way they WANT them to succeed. If you were to put two women side by side who accomplished the same goals but had a different political stance... the woman who didn't think like the liberals would be considered sub-human. It's a disgusting mockery of humanity.

An excellent article: Feminists against Palin - shame on you

The nomination of Sarah Palin for vice president is a big step forward for women, but a long backward step for the movement we have been taught to call feminism.

That is obvious from the anguish, indeed the fury, of feminist commentators. They are so intemperate in their criticism that they are incoherent. Men who are clueless about feminism naively think all women should be cheering. Sarah Palin is a woman who has done it all; she has a successful and even more promising career, five children and a supportive husband.

She crashed through the ultimate layer of the feminist fiction -the "glass ceiling" - and she joined those very few women destined to be known only by their first names. What more could any woman want?

The denunciations of Sarah can't be only because she appears to be a conservative Republican, and the feminists want only liberal Democrats to win. In this era of independent voters and respect for a maverick, surely the milk of bipartisanship should soften feminist angst about Sarah.

But, no. Feminist anger against Sarah has exposed the fact that feminism is not about women's success and achievement. If it were, feminists would have been bragging for years about self-made women who are truly remarkable achievers, such as Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, or former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina, or Sen. Elizabeth Dole, or even Margaret Thatcher. Feminists never boast about these women because feminism's basic doctrine is victimology. Feminism preaches that women can never succeed because they are the sorry victims of an oppressive patriarchy. No matter how smart or accomplished a woman may be, she's told that success and happiness are beyond her grasp because institutional sexism and discrimination hold her down.

When Hillary Rodham Clinton failed to get the Democratic nomination for president or vice president, she and her allies rained a torrent of tears all over the media about the injustice of it all, ranting that rampant sexism denied her the nomination she was due. The aging Gloria Steinem opined on CNN that it is "clear that there is profound sexism." She whined that Hillary couldn't crack the "glass ceiling" because there are "still barriers and biases out there."

Oh, the unfairness of it all! Steinem bemoaned that women find it so "difficult to be competent and successful and be liked." Au contraire, Hillary and women like her are not disliked because they are competent and successful, but because they are chip-on-the-shoulder feminists, living in an unhappy world of their own making and spreading their discontent like a virus. Feminists convey a notion of entitlement, as though they deserve special privileges today because of wrongs in past years that no one any longer can remember, such as women not having the right to vote. The bad attitude of victimhood is indoctrinated in students by the bitter feminist faculty in university women's studies courses and even in some law schools. Victimhood is nurtured and exaggerated by feminist organizations using their tactic called "consciousness raising," i.e., retelling horror stories about how badly some women have been treated until small personal annoyances grow into societal grievances. The feminists resent Sarah because she's the exact opposite of Hillary Clinton. When the liberal media sharpened their knives against Sarah, some chivalrous McCainiacs cried foul about media unfairness, but we didn't hear any whining from Sarah. Sarah has been successful because of hard work and perseverance, not because she's a woman, and she's not going to pull any crybaby act now. Sarah didn't need any Equal Rights Amendment, which Hillary is still promoting even though it was declared dead by the Supreme Court 26 years ago.

The feminist tirades against Sarah are mostly so tiresome, but one line of their complaints is really funny. After 40 years of telling wives and mothers to get out of the home (which Betty Friedan called "a comfortable concentration camp"), put their children in day care (tax-funded, of course) and join the workforce, these same feminists now tell Sarah to stay home with her children.

Sarah doesn't need feminist approval for her lifestyle; the only person whose OK she needs for her double career as mother and politician is her husband's, and he seems very happy with Sarah.

Sarah Palin is an exemplar of a successful, can-do woman, and the feminists simply don't know how to deal with her. I hope she will usher in a new era where conventional wisdom recognizes that feminist negativism is ancient history and American women are so fortunate to live in the greatest country on Earth.

Phyllis Schlafly is president of Eagle Forum, an attorney, and the author of 20 books, including "Feminist Fantasies." Contact us at insight@sfchronicle.com.

This article appeared on page G - 2 of the San Francisco Chronicle

Another request for violence from the Obama Team?

Obama requests that his supporters argue and get in the faces of those who don't agree with him... he asks that they make phone calls and knock on doors to do the same.

He claims his supporters are his ambassadors.

Well, Mr. Obama... your ambassadors are not welcome to knock on my door or get in my face to argue with me about "your case". It's up to you to make your case and change my mind. It's pathetic that you're so desperate that you have to request that the average, every day citizen go out and do your work for you.

This is a request for violence, Mr. Obama. Both you and the "lovely" Sandra Bernhard are requesting confrontation and, inevitably, violence. I have no use for your "changes" because it's clear to me that you want a civil war, no matter how it's obtained. You want it through reasons of race or reasons of guns or reasons of taxes or reasons of whatever flip-flop issue you can get your hands on.

I don't mind talking to others who think differently than me, Mr. Obama... what I mind is if they come to me and start screaming in my face or calling me all sorts of obscenities because you requested that they do so. You're a user and a horrible leader. You're not blind... you can see and read the news just like any other person on this planet. You know things are tense out in the real world and you know SOME of your supporters were hoping for a request for face-to-face confrontations because now they can say "well, Mr. Obama asked me to do it... I'm working FOR HIM".

No, Mr. Obama... you are another Hitler looking to abolish those who appose you and I am sickened by your ideals and your methods. I read people stating "it's politics so stop being such a wussy". Really? Why is it politics needs to get nastier and nastier with each generation?

Update: I began to think on this again a few hours later. You know... I don't mind phone calls and I don't mind visits or people stopping to talk to me. What I mind is when those people become jerks and start to lecture me or get angry if that same lecture doesn't change my mind. Those are the types of people who push me away and make me stronger in my own beliefs. They are foolish.

Friday, September 19, 2008

Obama in bed with theives ~ Heckled by Black Americans ~ Paying Women Less Than Men

Let's get it all out on the table with one post... all the latest and greatest Obama crap, lies, hypocritical moments, deviousness and downright disgusting activities.

Obama In Bed With Thieves


ANNCR: What Obama says…

BARACK OBAMA: It would be unacceptable for executives of these institutions to earn a windfall.

ANNCR: …Is not what he does.

Meet Jim Johnson, former Fannie Mae CEO. Fannie cooked the books and Johnson made millions.

Then Obama asked him to pick his VP. And raise thousands for his campaign.

Barack Obama. More empty words.

And now we have people saying this ad is racist... really... why? I don't get this... are they calling this ad racist because Raines happens to be a black man? Does that mean they find the ad regarding Jim Johnson racist as well or does that action only apply when speaking about a black person? It's outrageous that we aren't even allowed to speak of another person who happens to be black EVEN if that person is one of those who helped cause our current financial crisis.

I don't give a damn if a person is black or white or green or purple or red or any other color... if they commit wrongs, they open themselves up to criticism. If you can't handle being pointed at or shouted at or picketed or told to go home... then you shouldn't put yourself in the spotlight.

Let me ask you this... if I vote for Obama instead of McCain, does that mean I am racist against McCain? Liberals would say no and that I chose Obama because of the issues and the changes he's going to make. But if I vote for McCain instead of Obama.. then what... is it because I don't think he's qualified for the job? No... that can't be it... I must be racist.

Have you ever heard the old stand by... I love and/or I hate everyone equally. Well, it's true.

Wake up America: Obama Bundler And Former Advisers' Connections To Fannie Mae

Obama Heckled By Black Americans

David Drake: Obama Heckled By Blacks In Coral Gables - So... did all of the people who said McCain's ad about Raines was racist also state that the individuals in the video above are racist? Can a person who is black be racist against another person who is black? From what I've read so far, when this type of thing happens people say that they're just "confused or ill informed". Interesting.

Please note the ANGER ON OBAMA'S FACE... he's mad that they're there... he's mad that they even dare to interupt him and he's mad that anyone would disagree with him. Now... imagine this man in the whitehouse... a man who clearly has anger issues and needs some intervention. We can't have a guy like this making decisions for our country's safety.

Obama Pays Women Less Than Men

David Drake: Obama Pays Women Staffers Less Than Men - Can you say "hypocrite"... can you say "liar"... can you say "spitting mad"? As a woman, I get frustrated at not being paid as much as a man if I am doing the exact same job. National Review. So when Obama said in his little speech at the DNC this year and on his website in the article called "Remarks of Senator Barack Obama: The American Promise" the following remarks, was he just kidding?

And now is the time to keep the promise of equal pay for an equal day's work, because I want my daughters to have exactly the same opportunities as your sons.

Is this yet another flip-flop Obama? Did you mean to say that you think women should make as much as men UNLESS you happen to be the employer? Or will you say that you didn't know this was happening because you leave these types of decisions and responsibilities to someone else? The great Escape "cop-out" Artist strikes again.

Liberals know my vagina better than I do - even the dudes

Different day, more crap from those who call themselves liberals and probably embarrass the real liberals.

Margaret Cho on Sarah Palin... literally (link contains much vulgarity and lots of lovely language) - I used to laugh when Margaret Cho did her stand up bits. Loved their imitations of her mother and her off the wall comedy. A few years ago I rented one of her DVDs of a stand up night and that was enough for me. Thing is, it was during a time I really didn't know about the liberal hate that is stewing in America. All she did during that show was complain about the president and about republicans and it really wasn't funny... hell... even if she reversed it and complained about democrats, it still wasn't comedy; it was a lecture.

Now she's decided to be "cool" and join in on the "lets do Palin" campaign.

David Drake: Sandra Bernhard's Hate Speech On Palin

I think Sandra misses the pink meat barrel and is taking her lesbo-frustration out on attractive, smart and successful women like the lovely Sarah Palin. It's no more than jealousy on Bernhard's part. I mean come on, if you had a face like hers, wouldn't you too be a frustrated, hate-mongering lezbo? Sure you would.
I definitely agree... Sandra is jealous in ways the normal American can not understand. It's hard for a person like Sandra to accept the fact that other women might actually like Sarah Palin and not want to spend hours upon hours feeling bitter and hateful.

Miserable provocateur rails against conservative women again - Now I've seen some of Sandra Bernhard's movies and they were weird but she was "interesting"... but she's vanished into the comedian twilight zone... until she decided to call Sarah Palin a turncoat bitch (video available) and hopes she gets gang-raped in Manhattan.

When Sandra warns Sarah Palin not to come into Manhattan lest she get gang-raped by some of Sandra’s big black brothers, she’s being provocative, combative, humorous, and yes, let’s allow, disgusting.
I'm sorry... how is that provocative and humorous? That sounded much like a threat to Sarah and a dare to her "big black brothers" living in Manhattan.

Update: Just went to Gateway and noticed this post... Gateway Pundit: Obama Supporter Threatens Sarah Palin With Gang Rape - glad I'm not the only one who felt that was a threat... hell, that may have actually been considered a request.


White women, no way Once pro-Obama, but now swoon for McPalin? Who the hell are you? - And this idiot apparently knows my vagina more than I do.

Every white woman I know is positively horrified. Wait, that's not exactly true. It's more accurate to say that every thoughtful or liberal or intuitive or open-minded white woman I know worth her vagina monologue and her self-determination and two centuries of nonstop striving for equal rights and sexual freedom and exhaustive patriarchal unshackling is right now openly horrified, appalled at what the addition of shrill PTA hockey-mom Sarah Palin seems to have done for the soggy, comatose McCain campaign -- that is, make it not merely remotely interesting and melodramatic, but aggressively hostile to, well, to all intelligent women everywhere.

Truly, among women in the know and especially among those who fought so hard to bring Hillary Clinton to the brink of history, nausea and a general recoiling appear to be the universal reactions to Palin's sudden presence on the national stage, stemming straight from the idea that there's even a slight chance in hell such an antagonistic, anti-female politico could be within a 72-year-old heartbeat of becoming the most powerful and iconic woman of all time.

They say: You've got to be kidding me. They say: This is what we get? This could be our historic role model? Two hundred years (OK, more like 2000) of struggle, only to have this nasty caricature of femininity try to hijack and mock and undermine it all?

It cannot be true, they say. The universe must joking, would not dare dump such a homophobic, Creationist evangelical nutball on us, this anti-choice, God-pandering woman who's the inverse of Hillary, this woman of deep inexperience who abhors birth control and supports abstinence education and shoots exhausted wolves from helicopters and hates polar bears and actually stands for everything progressive women have resented since the first pope Swift-Boated Eve.

But now, the truly bizarre part. Despite this defiant outcry, a great many pundits and reports have suggested that, just after the Palin VP announcement, a sizable chunk of predominantly white women nevertheless abandoned their tentative support for Obama and leapt into the lyin' arms of McCain, presumably simply because of Palin's gender and PTA momhood.

And thus did the harrowing wail go out: WTF? Could it be true? Are cadres of formerly Obama-leaning white women really so enchanted by Palin's gender and motherhood status that they openly ignore the fact that she basically wants to shove women's rights back about five decades? Can it be so simple, crude, sad?

Let us analyze. Let me, being a straight white male and therefore only capable of gazing in awe at the spectacle that is the indecipherable female intuitive response, foolishly attempt to decipher some of it anyway, and explain why in hell some women might jump to Palin, despite the fact that she essentially hates them.
I love how this guy makes stuff up and expects women to swoon over his words. I do not believe that Sarah hates me nor am I selling myself out or other women because I favor her over Hilary.

Let's talk about Hilary for a minute. The "first lady" who stuck around after she found out her presidential husband was banging whatever happened to land in his lap in the white house. This is a woman who grabbed her cheating husband's tailcoat and held on for the ride. Did she forgive him for what he did or just stick around to get her shot at fame. I think she would have had more supporters if she stood up for herself and walked out of that jackasses life instead of using him for her own gain; at least she would have had more of my interest.

Fascist Democrats THREATEN Jewish Groups

When all else fails, the Democrats and Liberals have proved over and over again that if they can't get their way they will resort to threats, slander and violations of privacy. If the "wittle cry-baby dems" can't get what they want or... here's the kicker... if people actually don't agree with them... they scream injustices and lash out like Freddy with no mercy and no thought to how it might slash back into their faces.

And here in lies yet another proof of their injustices and their manipulative ways of "getting their way" because it is in their own self interest. Never mind the interest of our nation. You see... if Hilary or Joe were to show up to this protest, then the liberals and the dems would have been all over it... but since it's just Palin, they're completely against it... and... and...

and... they will threaten Jewish groups to get their way. When other countries say "dirty Americans", it's pretty clear who they're truly pointing their judgemental fingers at. Oh... it's very, very clear Uncle Sam... they point their fingers at Democrats. I know it doesn't look like it when you listen to their words... but what the Republicans are being accused of is exactly what the Dems are doing.

In the dictionary under the word HYPOCRITE... you will find DEMOCRATS. I never thought this way before... not until THEY started showing their true colors and starting coming out of the closet. What's in that closet? Hate and personal agendas... and other things, but I don't have 12 hours to spare right now.

Wake up America: Democrats Threatened Jewish Groups Over Palin Invite To UN Rally

Sources: Intense Pressure Led To Palin UN Snub
CBS 2 HD Has Learned Democrats Threatened To Attack Jewish Groups' Tax Exempt Status Over VP Nominee Invite

NEW YORK (CBS) ― Hillary Clinton won't be speaking at Monday's anti-Iran rally at the United Nations -- and neither will Republican Sarah Palin or any other politicians for that matter.

The reason? A heated behind the scenes tug-of-war.

Sources tell CBS 2 HD that a decision to disinvite Palin from the high profile rally after Clinton pulled out in a huff came as the result of intense pressure from Democrats.

"This is insulting. This is embarrassing, especially to Gov. Palin, to me and I think it should be to every single New Yorker," Assemblyman Dov Hikind, D-Brooklyn, told CBS 2 HD.

Sources say the axes were out for Palin as soon as Sen. Clinton pulled out because she did not want to attend the same event as the Republican vice presidential candidate.

"I have never seen such raw emotion -- on both sides," said someone close to the situation.

The groups sponsoring the rally against Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad speaking at the UN were reportedly told, "it could jeopardize their tax exempt status" if they had Palin and not Clinton or Democratic VP candidate Joe Biden on hand.

So all politicians were disinvited, most prominently, Palin.

"It's an absolute shame that this has happened," Hikind said. "To threaten organizations … to threaten the Conference of Presidents that if you don't withdraw the invitation to Gov. Palin we're going to look into your tax exempt status … that's McCarthyism."

Another Jewish group tried to step into the breach by inviting Palin to a different protest a day earlier.

"I'm absolutely appalled at the behavior of the Democrats," said Bob Kunst of Defenders.net. "I'm a Democrat and for the first time in my life I'm going to vote Republican. I can't take it anymore."

As for Sen. Clinton, she brushed right past CBS 2 HD's Lou Young when he tried to ask her about the issue on Thursday night.

Lou Young: "Were the organizers of Monday's rally right to depoliticize it?"

Clinton walked past Young, said "Thank you all very much" and started hugging people.

Clinton's people tell CBS 2 HD she intends to make some statement of support for the protestors. She is also expected to attack Ahmadinejad's pro-nuke, anti-Israel stance.

Democrats threaten to kneecap Jewish nonprofits - So if'n all of this stuff is true, how can the liberals look at themselves in the mirror and tell themselves that the conservatives or Republicans are the fascists? How can they even stand to be in the same room smelling the hypocrisy coming from their own pores?

It really wasn't until the last couple of years that the stench reached my nostrils. Republican, Democrat, Conservative, Liberal, etc. - it really didn't matter much to me. That is, until I realize that the Democrats and Republicans of "yesterday" have washed away into silence. Where are they? Are they hiding under a rock somewhere hoping things will turn out for the best?

The Democrats seem to be spending too much time trying to be socialist and the Republicans are spending too much time trying to be mini-liberals. Everyone is leaning left in order to please "just enough people" to get elected. I don't want false profits... I want real leaders who aren't afraid to straighten things out with a huge crowbar. We need a group of people who will slap a few faces and kick a few butts up and down the political hallway.

Thursday, September 18, 2008

Obama: A racist, a killer, a liar... a fraud!!

Every single abortion proponent in the United States Senate at the time they voted on this, the roll call vote was in 2001, every single one is more protective of human life in its early stages and more respectful of human life in its early stages than is Senator Obama based on his voting record. Article found here.

Barack Obama would deny a newborn baby medical care if that newborn was supposed to be aborted but somehow, through some miracle, survived such an operation. We're not talking about a fetus that is 3 weeks old... we're talking about a baby who can survive on it's own if just given a little boost in the right direction. He would insist that the child is left in a room to die.

~ ~ ~

"They want us to forget the insults we’ve put up with, the intolerance,” the announcer says in one of the ads as a picture of Limbaugh appears onscreen and the talk show host is quoted saying, “Mexicans are stupid and unqualified” and “Shut your mouth or get out.”

“They made us feel marginalized in a country we love so much,” the announcer continues. “John McCain and his Republican friends have two faces. One that says lies just to get our vote, and another, even worse, that continues the failed policies of George Bush that put special interests ahead of working families.”
Article found here.

"It is offensive and dishonest for Barack Obama to lie about John McCain’s record on immigration and years of support for the Hispanic community, when it was Barack Obama himself who voted for ‘poison pill’ amendments that killed the effort at immigration reform. Instead of making false ads with baseless attacks, Barack Obama should be apologizing to the Latino community,” said Rep. Lincoln Diaz-Balart, a Cuban-American lawmaker from Florida. Another article on this issue.

Taking the gloves off is not the same thing as completely deceiving people with misleading information. Obama slips into the gutter and swims around to get nice and slimy.

With every day that goes by, Obama proves he's nothing but a liar, an opportunist, a flip-flopper and a fraud. The media claims there will be race riots in the streets if Obama loses... there may be riots in the streets IF HE WINS because those of us with our heads screwed on correctly know what he represents. Barack Obama is a racist... he proves it with his words (search YouTube) and he proves it with his books.

He represents a socialist society and he is taking advantage of what is happening to our country financially while congress sits back and does nothing so that it will fall right into his lap. And all the while... these liberals and democrats that point their fingers at conservatives and republicans are the ones who are causing all of this to happen. Congratulations Queen Pelosi... you are one of the reasons this country is for sale.

And we still don't know who you are...

Wednesday, September 17, 2008


Fear is the mind killer...

... as one commenter asked... "Flight 93 fought back; why can't we". Good question.

And why would any woman in her right mind want to follow this doctrine? It is oppressive, racist, sexist and controlling. Why would anyone want to allow such a thing in our country... a country of freedoms!!

If these ideals are allowed to grow and flourish... our freedoms will be stolen from us and when someone decides they don't like the way you're dressed or the words coming from your mouth, they just might kill you and be rewarded for so doing. And as proved by their own past, if you're homosexual you will be hanged.

Come on Liberals... Feminists... homosexuals... Jews... everyone who might be oppressed by these radicals... do you want your freedoms stolen and your way of life stifled? Do you want to be jailed or killed? I DO NOT!! And I know that I would be on the list because I'm a fighter and I will fight for my freedoms and my country... and my family.

Don't give up and let all that we hold dear be stolen and mangled. These people profess their hatred of Jews... let's not let Hitler arise from the grave! These people hate strong women... let's not go back in time or be required to cover ourselves if we do not wish it. Those "blankets" are worn to oppress, stifle, control and above all else, to keep women feeling scared and ashamed.

We have come a long way in America... every man and every woman has rights other countries can only dream of and yet we are allowing evil to come inside and turn us against each other and make people feel guilty of being American. That is one of their weapons... to make individuals feel guilty and tell them they must make up for all of their sins by doing things they know keep down inside are wrong. That little voice telling them they're going down the wrong path gets bombarded with loud rage and it's hard to hear the truth.

Much more information found at RADARSITE

Sarah Palin's Email Invaded

The egomaniac that broke in to Sarah Palin's email account is a criminal and should be brought to justice.

But I would like to point out how many comments are being made on tons of different articles, blogs and journals stating that Sarah Palin deserves it because she's obviously hiding something... anything that will incriminate her and show how horrible she truly is.

Liberals cling to their guns of injustice and their religion of immorality and they hide behind posts calling themselves anonymous because they're apparently too chicken to take credit for their own words.

Let's take a look at some real beauties out there (at least they aren't from Anon):


Sarah Bell September 17th, 2008 5:29 pm ET
What is Sarah Palin hiding???? The American people deserve to know. And we demand an explanation as to why John McCain selected someone under investigation for corruption?? How is he getting away with this? Would Obama get away with picking Eliot Spitzer as his running mate??? Oh yea, I forgot about the whole "white privilege" thing. I smell BS.

Yasriel September 17th, 2008 5:36 pm ET
Why would a state governor use Yahoo to conduct state business?The more I hear about this woman, the scarier it becomes. She is a fraud, a wacko evangelical and a liar.

Abby September 17th, 2008 5:40 pm ET
I think this is a set up, a diversion. The real emails are destroyed or unavailable and these are just innocent stand ins.

Concerned Teen, Ga September 17th, 2008 5:42 pm ET
The republicans are probably going to blame this on the democrats like they always do. Gosh. So may skeletans in the republican closet! Wake up people! Please do what REALLY is the best for our country! Get up and vote for Obama/Biden on election day! Change we can believe in!

REAL Change September 17th, 2008 5:45 pm ET
This woman is full of DRAMA………..Isn't this what she did to the former Mayor of Alaska? Just a ideal maybe she can give the name of the person she used in Alaska

That's rich... I love how this person claims Sarah is full of drama... hello??? Most of the drama has been invented by the very liberal left. Sarah isn't full of drama and that's the real problem for them; they have to make stuff up to make her look bad.

Tech Voice is bound to get in trouble for showing actual screen shots of the emails.

Michelle has some interesting information... a link and a post showing Mr. Anonymous stating how and why he did it. Maybe he should get a sign...

Wakeup America [FBI spokesman Brian Hale said, "The FBI is aware of the alleged hacking incident involving Alaska Governor Sarah Palin and is coordinating with the United States Secret Service on the matter."] - there isn't much adult conversation at the Wired Blog Network but it's yet another place where I've read the accusation that these ARE NOT really screen shots but just a joke on us.

Gateway Pundit: LEFTISTS ATTACK PALINS- HACK PRIVATE EMAIL ACCOUNT! - you know what I love... how people keep saying "I wonder what she was hiding". All of these "goodie-goods" are hypocritical... the first thing I thought was "that is an invasion of privacy and someone should go to jail". Those who immediately felt she was hiding something are probably guilty of those same accusations.

Having your email broken into is much like having your home broken into, your stuff thrown all around and personal belongings stolen. If I had something in my home that the lady down the street would find offensive that doesn't mean I "had it coming" or that "I deserved it". That being said... if my house was broken into and there was something illegal, I would get charged with a crime.

And THAT is exactly what these jerks were hoping for... something illegal so they could say "well... I know I broke the law but look what I found". Thing is... per what I've read, those Anonymous users were planning on uploading porn to try to make her look bad. Lovely human beings we have here on Earth.

UPDATE: Adding Video... talks about Palin e-mail break in as well as O'Reilly

Saturday, September 13, 2008

Daily KOS: Disrespectful to all of the lives lost on 9/11/01

RADARSITE: America The Beautiful: Our Common Hallowed Ground - This kind of Daily KOS CRAP makes my stomach turn... they actually celebrated 9/11 like it was a child's birthday party. Gosh... too bad for the children of those killed on that day seven years ago who can't celebrate ANY of their children's birthdays with them EVER because our enemies decided it would be FUN to gently fly little, itty-bitty friendly airplanes into some of our happy buildings to cause just a little fire and smoke. No big deal... not like anyone got hurt or jumped out of buildings to their deaths or got burned alive or smashed into the rubble of concrete and steal. Good thing nothing like that happened or we would think those at the Daily KOS and those who support them were actually... hahaha... Anti-American, conspiring with the enemy and committing treason or anything unimportant like that. LOL... that's just silly, isn't it.

David Drake: KoS Spikes I Hate 9/11 Post - And isn't it nice when they try to hide what their loving supporters have said and what they have endorsed. Ooops... someone must have pushed the delete button. Could it be due to something called humanity or compassion or maybe even a sense of good vs evil? Could we ever hope for such a thing? No.. the "lovely" people at the Daily KOS woke up to find that the REST OF THE COUNTRY isn't too happy with them and they said "gee... lets get rid of the proof". Real heroes over there.

RADARSITE: b3ta.com: The Source of the Scourge - Here's why they're called the "beautiful people of the world". I'm not sure which one should get the Humanitarian of the Year Award, but I'm sure someone deserves it. Sarcasm... yet another dish best served ice cold.


I wonder... will the liberals and the humanitarians at the Daily KOS spit on my son when and if he must go to fight for their freedom to do just that; disrespect everything about America?

Lets not forget what REALLY happened on that day.

A note to the rest of the world...
America did not strike America... YOU know who did it and you're afraid. You know that America will not strike at you if you say crap about us; we are not that type of people.

Oh... but you know who the enemy is and you know that the enemy will strike at you and you're afraid... afraid... afraid. And instead of saying... shhhhhh, don't say this too loudly... Al-Qaeda... you blame America.

We won't kill you in the streets, slice off your heads or torture you to death. And guess what, if you aren't on our side... then you must be on their side, right?

Well, lets get this perfectly straight. If you aren't on our side, then that means YOU will let THEM in your front door and once they are inside... they will beat you, rape you, slice you, take your children as slaves, kill you if you're homosexual or don't agree with their religion, cover your wife's face while they rape her again and probably... just for kicks... slice off your testicles.

Why? Well, because... you were foolish enough to let them in the front door. How VERY foolish of you; not like you were ever warned... oh wait, you were! {I would appologize for being over dramatic but I'm probably down-playing this way too much}

But who will you eventually hold your hands out to and beg for help? America, that's who. And who will come to your aide? America, that's who. And who amongst you will thank America when we save you?


The answer is no one.

By then we will be considered pirates, villains and conquerors. We are too forgiving, too giving, too helpful and at the same time the world says we are selfish brats. Interesting... perhaps you should fight your own battles and stop asking America, the selfish brats that we are, for help.

Leave our family alone and take care of your own. One can only turn the other cheek so many times before they just can't take it any longer.

The liberals want our men and women to stay away from the armed forces. Hell... they may get their wish because eventually the only thing our citizens will want to do is tell everyone to go to hell and fight their own damn wars. And then we'll toss the liberals who helped create the problem out on their asses. Go live in Iraq or France or some place where they will "welcome" you with open arms and smiling faces.

Ever hear of a cheshire cat?

Forgive me... I'm a little agitated at ungrateful creatures who dare to call themselves human beings.

Thursday, September 11, 2008

Patriot's Day (9/11/08): Justin's Amazing Goals

Below is an email I sent to my friends and family earlier this morning. More so than any year before, I have found myself wiping the tears from my face as I remember this day. I sent the email to a handful of people and was wonderfully surprised when they started thanking me for sending it and telling me that they forwarded it on to people they knew because it said what they wanted to say but could not. One of my friends sat at her desk and cried... she said she was fine with "the day" until she read the email... but she was grateful I sent it.

People think of this date differently and feel different things from what they remember and what they know. I decided to forward it on to more people and again, I was met with thanks. One lady told me it caused her to look upon this day with a new prospective.

I am filled with pain from this date and I worry for the future, but this morning I felt it was time for me to share with others as I now share with you. Tomorrow I start a new life but I will never forget what has happened nor will I consider this date "just another day".

Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 10:36 AM
To: Names Removed
Subject: Justin's Amazing Goals

It’s amazing to me how fast time goes and usually I notice it when I think of the fact my son is actually 17 years old. As many of you know, he has joined the Army National Guard and will be going into basic training during the summer of 2009. He will be attending college for four years after that and will not be deployed unless we become involved in a “new” conflict. With so much going on in the world these days, he may end up having his college interrupted to defend our country.

Justin has made it a goal to make this a career as he will go from the National Guard into the Army as an officer after college. Therefore, he may indeed see himself in a situation that takes him from our loving arms and into the arms of a conflict. Perhaps that is why this year’s anniversary of September 11, 2001 (Patriots Day) is affecting me so greatly. It’s the knowledge that my son may be leaving my side to defend my freedoms that I hold so dear to my heart.

Although I find myself in tears at the thought of him simply moving down the street to go to college, I am very proud of his decision to defend his country and have such a lofty and wonderful goal for his future. He is a wonderful young man! I am afraid for his future when it comes to what he may face, but I have never been more proud of anyone in my life; he is more than I could have ever dreamed. Tomorrow, Michael and I are getting married and will have both of our sons in attendance… Justin will be wearing his uniform and I think that’s perfect.

May we each take the moment necessary out of this day and any day we feel the need to remember those who have gone before us in defense of our freedoms.

9/11 Videos: 7 Years Later

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

Is Senator Biden trying to throw this election?

In his own words he would have been honored to run WITH or AGAINST John McCain (see video below). So... since he couldn't run with him did he take on running against him just to be honored in so doing it? He states he thinks the country would be better off... better off in what way? More than likely he was stating the country would be better off with a man like McCain leading it.

So why did Joe Biden accept being Obama's VP running mate? Doesn't it seem odd that he would take the seat below a man he feels is not experienced enough to lead the country (see the two videos below).

And just today he claims Hilary would have made a better choice than him for Vice President. If that's true, then why did he except the position? Why didn't he tell Obama to choose Hilary? Or maybe he did but he was told "no" so he decided to do the next best thing.

It just seems a little fishy! Perhaps Joe Biden took this on because he feels he can help in sabotaging Obama's campaign. News for you JoeBama... he doesn't need your help in losing this election; all Barack has to do is speak in front of a camera and he adds yet another reason NOT to vote for him.

But seriously... why would he agree to running next to a man he doesn't believe in? I submit that Senator Biden is either trying to help Obama lose (again, he doesn't need help) or he's just so desperate to get his tush in some sort of presidential seat that he will run with Obama even though he's the wrong man for the job. Either way... he's a conniving politician who gives other politicians wet dreams.

After viewing the wonderful video files below, here are some more Biden facts: David Drake and his latest post about poor old pal of Biden: David Drake: Biden Asks Wheel Chair Bound Man To Stand Up

Video Files of Biden's Election-Throwing Techniques

Today, 9/10/08, Senator Biden claims that Hilary would make a better pick
for VP than him. Sounds like he's saying that Barack Obama made a mistake...
and if his campaign continues like this, that will definitely be true.

And definitely(?) an innocent mistake... but still another one of those goofs... ooops!
I'm wondering... if Senator Chuck Graham is Joe's "old pal", then how is it he
"forgot" that his "old pal" was in a wheelchair and COULDN'T stand up. Nice.

And here we have Joe Biden's own words about Barack Obama's readiness
for the presidency in August of 2007... has Obama gained enough experience
and knowledge in just one year to change Joe's mind?

So... I suppose SOME would say this is funny but how funny is it when you hear
a politician say one of those "old jokes everyone says"? Is it cute or innocent... or
just stupid to make stereo-typical jokes when there's A CAMERA RUNNING?
Video took place in June 2006. Clearly Joe's intent was to compliment... did he?

In 1988, Senator Biden felt that the white house wasn't the place to learn-as-you-go...
the candidate needs to know the territory in order to be a great president. He said
it again in August of 2007 but apparently, he has changed his mind.

A few links:

Wake up America: Joe Biden Admits Hillary Clinton Might Have Been A Better Pick As Veep - Wow... there's some real self confidence!

Gateway Pundit: LIPSTICK LIBERALS... Obama Camp Gangs Up On Alaska Mom - Looks like Obama really doesn't need your help Joe.

David Drake: Biden: "Hillary a better VP choice than me." - Doesn't it make you confident in Obama and Biden?

Monday, September 8, 2008

The Radicals Are Racist... Not You and Me

Oprah Winfrey will not invite Palin!

The comments made under the above post by the Gateway Pundit is what spurred on a post here. In particular, it was the post below made by an "anonymous" poster who stood up for Oprah's right to NOT invite Palin to her show.

Quickly... I believe it is Oprah's right to invite or not invite anyone she chooses... why she makes these decisions are what people are debating. Personally, I don't care who she favors but she does have a great influence over many people.

9/8/08 9:50 AM
Anonymous said...
I don't watch Oprah....but I have to agree that I really am scared about the ignorance of the American people. Some simple facts: Oprah did have Obama on her show once after the 2004 DNC and before he ran for senate and again after he won his senate seat and before he announced his decision to run for president. In both cases he was an incumbent (ie already in a position) and he was not being veiwed as someone running for anything. Another fact: She has openly supported Obama but not on her show only at rallies, fundraisers etc.....and the last time a checked every American no matter who they are or how well they are known has the right to support whom ever they want. Lastly, she also states that she is willing to have Palin on her show after Nov. 4. Whether some of you know this or not she would therefore have to have Obama on her show if she invited Palin or even McCain on her show prior to Nov. 4th.

Two last comments as a woman of color I am so insulted to here people calling Oprah racist because she supports a different candidate than you do....also maybe some of you don't realized that most of the people on her show are not black and she has had even Hillary Clinton on her show but again not when she was running for office. Her show has always been a show about entertainment and education and the argument most of you have about why gov. Palin should be on the show is very very valid however, no one can answer the question as to how the validity of this argument is diminished in anyway after Nov. 4.

I also awed by those who said that they have stopped watching her show because of the fact that she supports Obama. My only response to those people is how very narrowed minded of you. Again does she not have the right to support any candidate she wants. Believe it or not there have always been celebrities supporting candidates on campaigns, does that mean that you stop watching their movies and shows as well. Honestly if you only listen to what people on the right say or only to people on the left...its no wonder our country seems so divided and screwed.

The basis for my response to this person's post is the point she made wherein she states she is insulted that people are calling Oprah a racist because she does not support John McCain. I can understand that feeling... I get it every day when I hear the liberals calling yet another person who doesn't support Obama a racist.

My response:

11:32 AM
Bug said...
I feel it is Oprah’s right to choose whom she wants to come on her show… it IS her right. I am addressing the post made regarding how upset one of the commenters is that people are suggesting that Oprah is racist… I would like to point out that I, as a white woman, am appalled at how many times I see fingers pointing and people saying that those who are not black (especially whites) are racist because they don’t want to vote for Obama when there is no justification for such an accusation. Oh, there may be those who are, but they aren’t as common as its being made out.

I am not voting for Obama because I do not agree with his policies nor do I think he is qualified nor ready to be president. I do not care; as I have said in numerous places on the web, if the man is purple with green polka dots… it means NOTHING to me what color his skin happens to be.

My point is… the anger you feel towards others claiming that Oprah is racist because she is supporting Obama and not a white candidate is exactly what so many people are feeling when they are accused of racism because they don’t want Obama as their president. It’s insulting, obnoxious and just another way of trying to coerce people into doing something they don’t want to so they won’t be labeled.

I’m sick of it!

I will defend myself valiantly that I am not racist in any manner and I do not believe in any way whatsoever that a person who defends themselves against such an accusation is therefore exactly what they are fighting against being called. I will not turn the other cheek, I will not be called something I am not and just stand here and say “maybe you’re right… maybe I really am a bad person”.

NO!! No more!!

I care for people whom I wish to care for and it matters not what they look like… it matters what is in their heart and in their mind. Those who point their fingers and scream “racist” must be racist themselves for noticing these differences… I have no more time for these individuals than for criminals.

So with that in mind, it isn't appropriate to call Oprah racist either... no one should be accused of such an act unless there is undeniable proof. Now... with Obama's book, there is a lot of doubt about whether or not HE is racist and HE has put it out there right in front of our noses. I have my questions about his thoughts and it worries me a great deal.

The lines are blurred between realities. Regular people (liberals, conservatives and those in between) believe they are right and that they are the ones being victimized. Can all sides be right? I would like to point out that the radicals are the ones doing the pointing, lying and screaming and it's the regular folk who are being sucked in, consumed and MADE to feel angry (I know they've made me angrier than I have ever been in regards to standing up for my country, my beliefs and my rights).

It is these radicals who want another civil war and it seems race is the easiest fuel to add to the already lit fire. It has been and may always be (if we can't change) a subject that will flare up, smolder out and flare up over and over again. There are people from every race who are prejudice against some other race... they will inevitably always exist; but they are not the majority.

I do understand the desire for individuals to be surrounded by others who are like them and it seems "appearance" is a major factor. We want to feel a part of a family even outside our own immediate family. We want to be welcomed, accepted and special and what better way than to be with those who are "like" us and understand us. It is a frightening feeling to be surrounded by those who do not understand us or are against us for whatever reason... it makes us want to flee to our homes and our groups.

I was shunned growing up, particularly in High School, because I did not LOOK like everyone else. No... it wasn't the color of my skin... it was a disfigurement in which I was made fun of or, even worse... I was ignored. I've come a long way from that type of prejudice but it hurt and I feel hardened inside at times in an effort to "not feel" any pain or rejection.

I've learned during the last 20 years after High School that I am beautiful, inside and out! It was my own lack of self esteem that made me ugly. I have been told numerous times that I am beautiful and, to my own joy, I do turn heads. And, no, I don't say that because I'm stuck-up (it is often hard for me to boost my own ego)... I say that to show that it was the inside that needed to find the beauty and in so doing, the outside just played along.

Growing up... my desire was not to be accepted by a group or race... my desire was just to be accepted by the human race.

Oh, I know someone will tell me that I can not compare prejudice against a disfigurement with prejudice to skin color because you can change a disfigurement but not the color of your skin. I have fixed what I could but there is no way I can look completely "normal". I have to say that the only people who notice, are those who are more interested in perfection of appearance than the regular people of the world.

If I "notice" a person's skin color or race... it's because I'm interested in them... their life, where they have been or where they are from, how they think, what they want out of life... and I want to know if any of that comes from their experiences being raised in another community, another country or within the walls of another religion. I crave the knowledge of how life was for someone else. One of my good friends just recently moved back to Korea and she and I could sit and talk about what it was like for her growing up in Korea. I would ask her questions about the Korean language and what it was like learning English (her second language) and she would ask me questions about what it was like for me to learn Japanese. We would joke about things... and there was no animosity or resentment... I knew what she meant and she knew what I meant.

And I miss her.

One day I hope appearance won't matter... it doesn't to me. But until the day when the self-involved stop trying to hide behind "fairness" and "equal rights" in order to suppress or disguise their own racist beliefs... nothing much will change.

Sunday, September 7, 2008

MTV - Viewers Speak Out Against Their Host

From what I have read on-line, more so during the last few years, individuals who are liberal have been pushing their beliefs upon others relentlessly and without any concern for others they may be harming. I'm sure others would say it's been happening a lot longer than a couple of years, but remember... the Internet was only invented a short time ago by Gore.

It's taken some time to gain this thought because I like to think everyone is intelligent and makes decisions based on that thought process (Ha!). If someone thinks differently than me, I do not automatically assume they are wrong; I analyse and decide for myself.

Liberals are used to conservatives taking it from behind with a reach around just for show. I, for one, am just a tad bit tired of this unwanted and unwarranted attention.

This year I am seeing a lot of angry people on-line. It comes from the left a great deal and they are upping the anti in order to get their forced Obama-brator down my throat (thanks... didn't want to see Debbie Does Dallas back then and don't want to play dress-up now).

But during the last month, I've seen a turn around... conservatives are tired of playing nice and hoping the liberals will just leave them alone and stop asking for this and that and every last possible special right they can get their filthy hands on. This time around, conservatives and republicans and average, every-day normal people are fed-up. I'm fed up... I am not a hard-core conservative... my soon-be-husband would call me more of a moderate, for lack of a better term.

People are pissed... Michelle Malkin mentioned the MTV Awards and I loved following the links on this one.

MTV apparently believes all of their views are liberal and LOVE to hear from a NOBODY from Britain to bash our president. He TELL US who to vote for, makes fun of a young girl who is facing pregnancy, jokes that our teen boys will end up "republican" if they have unprotected sex (never mind that they may get an STD or face pregnancy), call us racists if we don't elect Obama, basically tell us Bush would not be allowed to live in England, claim that Palin's daughter's pregnancy is a P.R. stunt and call our President a "retarded cowboy fellow".

I don't know... how does that make you feel? Does it make you want to break out in laughter... really? Why is some moron from another country telling ME who to vote for and telling ME I'm a racist and telling ME my president is bad? Who is this low-life and why do I care what he thinks? I care because it's none of his business... his country is FAR, FAR from perfect. Glass houses... remember... glass houses.

Well the "liberal" viewers (not all are, remember) were not happy... here's a link to the THOUSANDS of comments from viewers to MTV and most of them are extremely angry. Here is yet another link to more angry comments, like the one below.

catsum 09.07.08 11:06
I am sitting here reading these responses and this is why too I had to sign up for an account tonight. Most of you people on here are smart and thank GOD that you are using the brain that you have been given. To the VERY few of you that think what he has done is ok, you need to pick up a book and educate yourself. First off, whether you like Bush or not, he was elected by the AMERICAN people for both terms. You people that just follow the media and people such as this yahoo, is the reason you think Obama is the right direction. He should not be elected just because he is black. He should be elected because he stands for great things and has a proven track record, which he does not. I do not care if someone is black, brow, purple or a monkey, I vote for the best person for the job is based on experience. Before you speak, educate yourself on the truth. Shame on you people and shame on MTV for not speaking the truth about what the world needs. You speak about Obama, next time speak about a real hero and the person who needs to run the country, JOHN MCCAIN! As for the comments about teenage pregnancy and abstinence, how dare he say these comments against the Jonas Brothers. Thank God there are still kids in today’s society like the Jonas Brothers and Jordan Sparks that have respect for themselves and don’t let idiots like this guy detour them from them.
I like this... educate yourself and don't vote for someone BECAUSE he is black, vote for him based upon his experience. How revolutionary!! This person hit it right on!

And per Michelle's update while I was composing this post, the Associated Press has given us this bit of news on his perfomance.

Saturday, September 6, 2008

Captain Janeway and Sarah Palin

I was thinking to myself today as I watched an old episode of Star Trek Voyager how much Captain Janeway reminded me of Sarah Palin. In some ways the way she looks, in other ways her determination and her drive.

After searching the web regarding Captain Janeway and the actress who played her, Kate Mulgrew, I began to wonder if she would appreciate being compared to Sarah Palin.

Personally, when I say they remind me of each other, I am giving both individuals a great compliment. There were parts of the Janeway character that bothered me and there will probably be parts of Palin that bother me... but for the most part, I find both individuals remarkable and strong.

The reason I am not sure of Mulgrew's appreciation is due to what I found out about her life and that of the basis for Kathryn Janeway (of course, who can believe what you read on-line these days). Turns out that the character Kathryn Janeway was based on the feminist author Elizabeth Janeway. That in and of it's self does not state that Mulgrew would dislike the comparison between the Janeway character and Palin but I did find that she is married to Tim Hagan who ran for Governor of Ohio on the Democrat seat. Again... this does not mean she would or would not be flattered.

I am interested now on what Kate Mulgrew's position is on the upcoming presidential election... some of what Kate Mulgrew's Biography indicates makes me believe she may favor a liberal president (due to her husband being democrat and a couple of other points... but not all democrats are liberal); on the other hand she has said the following:

"Life is sacred to me on all levels. Abortion does not compute with my philosophy."
but she also said...

"Execution as punishment is barbaric and unnecessary." [When speaking of the death penalty.]
And since the character Janeway is based upon a feminist writer... that would indicate Kathryn Janeway, if she were a real person, would favor Obama, right? I read a bit about Elizabeth and it wasn't completely clear what type of feminist writer she was however, she was a director of the National Organization for Women's legal and education fund. I have visited the NOW sight and I know where they stand. I guess the question is... was the organization the same when Elizabeth was a part of it as it is now?

I can see how Kathryn Janeway may be considered a feminist... but I would like to point out that there are different types of feminists. There are those who dress in pink and steal passes in order to get their 5 seconds of fame and then there are those Feminists for Life who are real people who hold the word feminist along side with feminine and they do not hate everyone who opposes them.

It doesn't matter... I am complimenting both Palin and Mulgrew's character Captain Kathryn Janeway; both of which are leaders who lead their crews home to victory.

After doing a little more research, I came upon this on Wikipedia which states.

Mulgrew is also an opponent of abortion as well as capital punishment. She received an award from Feminists for Life, a pro-life feminist group. She is quoted as saying "Execution as punishment is barbaric and unnecessary" and "Life is sacred to me on all levels. Abortion does not compute with my philosophy"
Well... I guess I hit that nail on the head when I mentioned Feminists for Life a few paragraphs up. So... perhaps Mulgrew AND Captain Janeway would be happy to be compared to Sarah Palin. We may never know.

Thank you Kate for playing such a wonderful role no matter what your political affiliation and thank you Sarah for stepping up and accepting the VP nomination. May we see your smiling face and your Reagan mentality in the white house soon!


One comment came from a reader who states that Mulgrew does support Obama. I did find an Obama banner on her Facebook site but haven't found the info on her other site TotallyKate. I will look again tomorrow as it's late now and my eyes are burning. :o)


Thanks to those who provided the links. One of them definitely shows Kate declaring her favoritism towards Obama. The video is found on Kate's website and she stated on August 23, 2008 that she wasn't allowed to talk about politics and then said Obama about 6 times (Palin was announced on August 29th). The other video found on YouTube does not say anything about Obama, but it is VERY clear that she does not like the current administration (presumably President Bush in particular).

I think Kate is a fantastic person and obviously we don't agree completely on who should be president... but that's okay. If we all agreed, all the time, then we would be mindless zombies and we wouldn't want that!

This comparison is not political in any way... I am not comparing Kate Mulgrew to Sarah Palin nor am I comparing Captain Kathryn Janeway to Sarah Palin in a political nature. I am comparing a deeper characteristic than that... I am comparing their compassion, their drive and determination and the fact they are all strong women.

Friday, September 5, 2008

9/11 Videos - 7 years Later

I know it isn't quite September 11th but I'm feeling strong about this NOW and waiting until the actual anniversary will not make a difference; I feel this way no matter what the date.

It's been almost 7 years now since that dreadful day and still we are not allowed to see footage of our country under attack. It's a disgrace that we are being kept in the dark and not allowed to feel the compassion and the anger we all felt on that horrible day. I know there are those out there that think allowing me to feel anger for what was done means that I have not "gotten over it" or "moved on with my life" or that I'm somehow a violence worshiper.

I do not love violence and if it were destroyed every where in the world, I would feel safe. But to tell me I have to get over it and move on is an asinine statement and telling another person how to feel is stupid and, quite frankly, dangerous.

Those growing up who are in grade school know nothing about it other than "it happened"... High Schoolers either didn't see it when it happened or have forgotten it because it isn't talked about in school or at home. My son was only ten years old and he did see it... but does not remember it. I have let him know about it and it is a discussion anyone in my house can have if they want... I do not "bring it up" randomly; there is always a reason for discussing it. He needs to know that terrorists attacked our country and killed our friends and family members.

At the RNC they showed a tribute video that is now found on YouTube under the following description:

This "tribute" which served to only throw fear into the political discourse and frighten voters was shown at the 2008 Republican National Convention. Keith Olbermann spoke for many of us at the sickening images used for political gain.
Go here to watch the video... and here for disussion by Glenn.

There are tons of comments under this video and any comment that is not in agreement with Keith Old'Weinie is slashed with negative marks. My own comment was marked within two minutes of posting (I was agreeing with one of the few who think at least a little like myself):

Very true... it bothers me that we are "protected" from this sight. What happened was brought about by terrorists and evil people who want to enslave every country they can get their hands on. It is disturbing and it does bring a tear to my eyes... but it also reminds me what we're fighting for and why we are fighting still today. These evil people will continue to try to kill anyone that does not think like them... I do not wish to be their servants.
Of course, I go back now and that negative mark is gone... not sure how that worked out, but whatever. I made another post and we'll see how many get mad at me. I DO understand why the videos of 9/11 upset them... they upset me... but there is a difference. I watch them and feel compassion and pain for those who have died and I want to make sure it doesn't happen again by destroying terrorism. Others feel compassion and pain but for some reason want to let the terrorists kill more of our Americans. They feel sending troops is going to cause more deaths... there will be troops who die and it is a horrible, horrible thing. If we don't destroy terrorism then millions of us will die.

I don't make that last comment lightly... my son has joined the Army National Guard and goes to his drill training this weekend. Next summer he will be at basic and, unless there is a new conflict, he will be attending college for four years. And YES... the issues with Georgia and Russia COUNTS... based on when he signed up and when this conflict started. If America gets involved militarily then he will have to be shipped out and put his college on hold. We hope and pray that doesn't happen but he, along with myself, understood such a thing could happen. Actually, it was almost guaranteed that we would be in some sort of conflict during some time in his career because of all the crap going on in the world and the way everyone is full of hate and anger... even in our own country.

To those who say Americans are terrorist... shame on you! We can only turn the other cheek so many times before we must strike back. There are disgusting individuals who want us to beg for forgiveness for something we didn't do... to let the enemy strike us again while we say...

"Thank you sir... may I have another!!"

No thanks! I am a proud American... and pride is not a dishonorable or evil attribute IF that pride also brings people together to DO GOOD... not to turn everyone into what you want, rape their bodies or their minds... or kill just for the sake of killing. No god goes around telling people to spread his word and KILL THOSE WHO DON'T CONVERT!! Those who state their "god" is telling them to do that type of thing is ignorant, enslaved or trying to rule the world.

The above video is pretty good and it shares what happened on 9/11. I don't know for sure what the posters position is or why he/she posted it, but it seems fairly unbiased... although there are 36,466 comments and they are NOT all good, that's for sure.

It will get a few tears flowing and make you think back to all those people who are gone and all those that tried to save them and are still trying to save us.


The video below is entitled "War" and the description is Video of war footage: The song is Bodies by Drowning pool. This one gets your adrenalin pumping to get out and kick some terrorist ass... no matter what Code Pink "lady" they hide behind.

It will get you out of your seat to make those monsters pay.


And this video below is one of my favorites and I have posted it before... but it needs to be seen again and again. Here is the comment the creator had to make about her video after 5,237 comments.
ATTENTION! I apologize for any inconvenience, but I have been receiving way too many negative comments and people arguing with and insulting each other in comments on this video. After a lot of hard thought, I have decided to disable comments on my video. I may or may not turn them back on again, we'll have to see. Again, I'm sorry, but you can thank the people who decided to turn this into a debate forum. Thank you for your time, and I apologize again to those of you who didn't do anything wrong.

This is her newest video called "Don't Give Up"...

Thursday, September 4, 2008

Code Pink: Forceful, Scary & Thoroughly Un-American

New Info 9/5/08: Code Pink Stole Delegate's Identity! - Isn't that just pretty in pink. Please note there is an audio of an interview with the owner of this identity wherein she denies any association with Code Pink. The "lovely" founder of said organization claims someone gave them extra passes. I guess we're going to play the "she said/she said" game.

~original post~

I really don't have an issue with people wanting to change things in their life if they feel things are bad... but forcing yourself on someone else and yelling in their face or calling our soldiers terrorists; that is uncalled for. And giving your support to terrorists fighting against OUR TROOPS is the ultimate disgrace.

Four CODEPINK women arrested at 4 p.m. in St. Paul in act of civil disobedience - I love how they actually list their phone numbers... just in case someone wants to call.

"We are proud of the CODEPINK women who did civil disobedience to show their outrage at the Bush and McCain policies and the nomination of Sarah Palin," said co-founder Medea Benjamin. "In the face of over 100 riot police they put their bodies on the line as a show of their determination to elect leaders in this country who stand for peace."
And I wonder how much more proud they would have been if those bodies had actually been harmed or in some way these women became martyrs? Does it remind you of any other group... say... those who tie bombs to women and children in order to "move their cause forward". Their agenda is not for peace... they are the same as Jesse Jackson and the like. If they got their way... it would all end for them and they can't have that... their self-inflicted misery would be washed away and they would be forgotten.

The two protesters had official guest passes, and managed
to get right up to the podium near VP candidate Sarah Palin.

Code Pink ladies say, 'We're not scary'

Singing "Sarah Palin, we know what you stand for, you'll save a fetus in the womb and send it off to war," a couple of dozen pink-clad members of Code Pink, a women-led peace organization, took a short protest march this afternoon from the St. Paul Hotel to Rice Park.

Group co-founder Jodie Evans complained that police response to her group's protests this week have been "snarky" and "violent" including an arrest of one member Monday night. She also said mounted police pushed her group away from Palin's Minneapolis hotel Wednesday with their horses.

"How scary do we look? It's a really mean way to treat women dressed in pink," Evans said.

First of all... these two ladies ARE scary. Look a them!

Second of all... if wearing pink indicates that you are not scary... how long will it take criminals to start wearing pink and claiming in court that they were "treated poorly" because they were "wearing pink" and CLEARLY that means they are good people and we shouldn't have to worry about them doing something wrong.

Oh... and here are a couple of examples. These two dudes truly ARE NOT as scary as the pictures of the Code Pink "ladies" and they ARE committing crimes... so how do you expect us to feel when these scary women come at us yelling and waving their arms at us?

And what about this? How would you feel having a woman yelling at you while pushing her hands painted red representing blood right up against your face? Some would just be angry but truly... this is a frightening picture and this "lady" is threatening another person.

THAT IS SCARY... and it wouldn't matter if this woman was wearing what she has on or a little pink jumper suit. She is a threat and she is scary. And I did watch the video to this and it was ended fast... but even a brief moment with someone coming at you head on, waving their hands and yelling things is scary.

May we each take the moment necessary out of this day and any day we feel the need to remember those who have gone before us in defense of our freedoms. Without them... we would not be "here"... we would be in chains. ~Bug~